CBC runs baseless story with no regard for facts or truth

Published Saturday June 6th, 2009
A3

SAINT JOHN - On May 12 the Telegraph-Journal published a story about a group of professors at the University of New Brunswick who were upset about the fact that Premier Shawn Graham was receiving an honorary degree.

The story, written by a summer intern named Matt McCann, contained a number of factual errors - the misspelling of university secretary Stephen Strople's name, his title and the full slate of degrees held by Premier Shawn Graham. In addition, the story did not adequately portray both sides of the story.

"These kinds of errors of fact and judgment don't constitute acceptable journalism at the Telegraph-Journal. We must cover stories with integrity, clarity and absolute accuracy," Shawna Richer, the newspaper's editor, said.

In a conversation that day with Richer, McCann acknowledged the errors but "did not seem to fully grasp the seriousness of them," Richer said. "He was not a first-year intern. He worked here last summer. We expected more of him."

Based on his performance, a decision was made to terminate his summer employment, and he was informed of that decision the next morning, on May 13.

Subsequently, in the days following, McCann's dismissal was a news item on the CBC Saint John morning show, followed by a commentary by former Telegraph-Journal editor Mark Tunney, who said that McCann must have been let go, not because of mistakes in his story, but because the story made the governing Liberals upset and they in turn complained to the Irving family, the newspaper's owners.

Tunney said that Irving business interests depend on a good relationship with the provincial government, and he suggested that the newspaper was pressured to fire Mr. McCann.

"The allegation is untrue," Richer said. "Mr. McCann was let go because he didn't perform to expectations. This is a personnel issue."

In the past two days, McCann has appeared on the CBC television and radio news, saying only that he doesn't believe he was fired for reasons given by the editor, but not speculating further.

Tunney has repeatedly called McCann "a scapegoat."

The Telegraph-Journal stands by its decision to fire McCann for the performance reasons outlined.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (34)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Good grief, 3/4 of the CanadaEast staff is headed out the door based on what Ms. Richer says. As the editor is she not responsible and aware what goes in the paper? Wouldn't she be checking things even more if the person was an intern and not a full time staff person?

Last week the Moncton Times and Transcript ran an editorial stating New Brunswick has no full fledged CBC station. The only problem is we have...since 1994. Based on Ms. Richer's statement the entire editorial staff at the TnT now must be fired because of their poor fact checking and less than absolute accuracy. The McCann issue has dealt another serious blow to the Telegraph's credibility.
200
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Bias Watch, Moncton on 06/06/09 07:18:36 AM AST
I've read Matt McCann's stories for a few years in this paper and I think it's irresponsible for that Ms. Richer claim he was fired for making these small factual errors.

As a frequent news-reader, I see many clarifications posted in this paper and in the Times and Transcript and DAily Gleaner. These clarifications cover a wide variety of errors - from misspelled names, to out and out mistakes.

People understand that mistakes happen. It's impossible to believe that every story that runs will be 100 percent accurate, because people make mistakes. The peopel who speak to reporters make mistakes. Reporters make mistakes. Editors make mistakes.

From what I've read about McCann's experience, this response seems slightly bogus. There's more here than meets the eye. I think this is another example of the great power wielded by institutions like the provincial government and the University of New Brunswick.
167
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
News Watcher, NB on 06/06/09 08:35:58 AM AST
Interesting - this story seems to have written itself: no byline that I can see. And nothing to indicate that it is an editorial placed on a news page instead of the editorial or "opinion" page. Even has the location slug to indicate it is factual news and not opinion.

I hope somebody else doesn't lose their job over this. ;-)
180
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Barn Acles, Saint John on 06/06/09 08:51:40 AM AST
Shawna Richer, Ron Barry, and David Stonehouse clearly don't understand what their jobs are. They are the EDITORS of the Telegraph-Journal. They are required to EDIT stories written by their reporters. But this isn't the first time they've screwed things up. They failed to fire Benjamin Shingler after he took credit for stories written by a number of other reporters working at other newspapers in the Irving empire. As much as I believe it will accomplish nothing, it is time, once again, to open the debate about the media monopoly in New Brunswick. Or at the very least, hire some real editors to run the flagship newspaper. Richer must learn that when you (really) fail to do your job, you must face the consequences. There's the door Shawna, don't let it hit you on your way out.
155
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Curious George, NB on 06/06/09 10:08:20 AM AST
The TJ should be ashamed to publishing such absolute Crap. How can Jamie Irving and Shawna Richer sleep at night? I will be cancelling the Telegraph Journal first thing Monday morning!!!!!
156
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Allen H., Saint John on 06/06/09 12:05:17 PM AST
What a load of crap! If anyone should have been shown the door, it should be the editors. Aren't they responsible for approving anything that goes to print?

"In addition, the story did not adequately portray both sides of the story." And this paper does this when the name Irving is involved, yeah right!
148
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
B Hanley, Calgary on 06/06/09 02:22:35 PM AST
It would appear to me that the EDITOR not the reporter should be fired if the story was not factual.

The buck stops with the Editor, in my mind.


138
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
M. Connors, Miramichi on 06/06/09 03:17:05 PM AST
This 'rebuttal' just shows everyone what a rag that this Irving-owned bird cage liner really is.

You know what. The Editor and Irving should be waterboarded for crimes against intelligence. Pathetic. Simply pathetic!

The Mad Ape
115
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Mad Ape, Tatumba.com on 06/06/09 08:04:12 PM AST
When was the last time that an Irving-owned business showed both sides of the story when it concerned their business practices?

These guys have a team of lawyers who are tasked with milking the public treasury of as much money as they can get.

The Mad Ape
94
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Mad Ape, Tatumba.com on 06/06/09 08:08:25 PM AST
This incident is likely to start a major war of words between the CBC and the Irvings. Maybe bigger than the one when Woodstock had two papers. And I welcome it. Let them go at each other, and maybe someone will reveal something remarkable that might get the provincial and federal governments to take a serious look at the media monopoly in New Brunswick.
117
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Curious George, NB on 06/06/09 08:23:52 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles