Minister says power pact would yield savings

Published Thursday November 5th, 2009
A3

FREDERICTON - Energy Minister Jack Keir is trying to clarify the benefits of the proposed energy deal between New Brunswick and Quebec.

Keir says New Brunswick would save about $275 million in replacement fuel costs during the Point Lepreau refurbishment, if the energy agreement between New Brunswick and Quebec goes through.

"I think it's important to get the facts out there, that folks understand not only what the opportunities are with (this agreement), but what the status quo means," Keir told reporters in Fredericton Wednesday.

If the project remains 18 months behind schedule, the cost of replacement power for that period will be $400 million.

But if the energy agreement is signed by the end of March 2010, Keir says New Brunswickers will only be responsible for $125 million of that, with the rest to be paid by Quebec.

Keir has called on the federal government to assume the cost overrun because the work is being done by Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., a federal Crown corporation.

The refit of the reactor was supposed to have been complete by the end of September.

Opposition leader David Alward told reporters later Tuesday that Keir was merely repeating what was already in the agreement.

"A bad deal is a bad deal," he said.

- with files from The Canadian Press

 

Comments (3)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

The status quo is bad for residents and industry too. Residential rates have gone up nearly 30% over the last few years. When you take into account the replacement costs to cover Lepreau, the fact that we don't have anything as cheap as hydro to generate, plus the NB Power debt that kept being passed along to consumers ... the status quo would have gotten pretty expensive, pretty fast.
6
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Janet Logan, Moncton on 05/11/09 07:38:13 AM AST
"I think it's important to get the facts out there, that folks understand not only what the opportunities are with (this agreement), but what the status quo means," Keir told reporters in Fredericton Wednesday."

We understand the situation a little more than you'd like us to Mr Keir.
A 30% drop for big indutrial user rates and only a temporary rate freeze for the rest of us.

Why else would you be spending a million dollars trying to pull the wool over our eyes?

The government never had to start a PR campaign to give us GST cheques or a familly allowance did they? They only do it when they're trying to screw us.

8
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J B, Riverview on 05/11/09 09:41:02 AM AST
Most people agree that the status quo won't work but would hope that there would be other alternatives that maybe should be considered.This deal was hastily done without proper consideration of all the consequences. And this replacement power cost number is questionable as well.The numbers being presented assume the power will be replaced by costly oil burning units when in fact a lot of the power is cheaper energy being purchased from Quebec or power produced from burning coal,which is also cheaper than oil.The replacement costs for Quebec will be cheaper still.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Little Guy, NB on 05/11/09 05:28:29 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles