Committee backs flat tax on income

Published Friday November 21st, 2008
A1

FREDERICTON - A committee studying proposed changes to the provincial tax code will soon recommend the Liberals implement a flat income tax rate, boost the HST and slash the province's corporate tax rate - all while giving the boot to the notion of a carbon tax.

Click to Enlarge
Ben Shingler/Telegraph-Journal
Auguste Gallant, spokesman for the New Brunswick Fair Tax Coalition, speaks to the media Thursday in Fredericton during a protest of the Liberal government's proposed tax reforms.

The bi-party committee examining the taxation issue largely concluded its business Thursday. A draft of the committee's final report was leaked to the Telegraph-Journal and a member of the group later confirmed minor changes that were made during Thursday's final editing session.

The end document, which will soon be presented to Finance Minister Victor Boudreau and tabled in the legislature, will recommend the government execute a flat income tax rate of 10 per cent.

Such a move, states the report, would simplify the tax system and give New Brunswick the lowest overall personal income tax rate in Canada.

The committee, which held public consultations on the Liberal tax proposals this summer, says the flat tax was heartily endorsed.

The document also calls on the Liberals to chop the general corporate income tax rate to five per cent from 13 per cent, which would make it equal to the current small-business tax rate.

Ottawa has challenged the provinces to lower their corporate tax rates to 10 per cent, to match Alberta - home of the country's lowest provincial corporate tax rate.

But the committee argues New Brunswick should push further to improve the local climate for business and capital investment.

And then there's the idea of a carbon tax.

When the Liberals unveiled their potential reforms back in June, the plan was immediately blasted for its mention of such a measure. Not surprisingly, the committee calls for government to ignore the tax, which would be levied on carbon fuels and emissions.

According to the committee, a carbon tax would put the province at a competitive disadvantage because of its heavy reliance on fossil fuels for electrical generation. The report notes that 58 per cent of electricity in the province comes from sources that would be subject to the tax.

A carbon tax, it concludes, requires more study.

But the lack of a carbon tax creates a problem: how to fund the personal and corporate tax cuts.

The original Liberal plan claimed the cuts - up to $500 million a year - would be funded through the carbon tax and a boost to the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST).

The HST, it was proposed, could be put back to 15 per cent - an increase of two percentage points.

However, while the tax committee recommends a boost to the HST, it doesn't specify by how much. The report just says government should increase it to offset the corporate and personal tax cuts - meaning it could go above 15 per cent.

"The options for restructuring our tax system are very limited without another source of revenue," concludes the report of life without a carbon tax.

Still, the paper argues there must be HST protection for low-income earners and seniors, who spend a higher percentage of their earnings on taxable goods.

So the committee recommends a rebate program, similar to federal GST rebate, to lessen the impact on low-income earners.

Property taxes were also a major concern during the committee's summer hearings. The report describes the current setup as "regressive and inequitably imposed."

It also chides the "unexpected and escalating assessments" that New Brunswickers face.

So, Boudreau will be told to reduce the non-residential property tax rate from $2.25 to $1.50 per every $100 of assessed property value.

And, the committee says, the Liberals should reduce the $1.50 tax (per $100 assessed property value) on residential properties not occupied by the owner, such as apartment buildings.

As well, says the report, the Grits should extend the $0.65 tax rate to all types of properties in local service districts and impose a three-year average assessment value on property.

Committee head Roly MacIntyre concludes that the tax changes should be made gradually over five years.

On Thursday the Saint John East MLA told reporters it will require "major guts" to actually implement the measures.

Opposition critic Bruce Fitch says the plan is all wrong.

The Riverview MLA said raising the HST will be harmful to low-income earners who already pay less than 10 per cent income tax.

Fitch also opposes the deep corporate tax cut - as long as the small-business tax remains unchanged at five per cent.

The committee report also calls on the Shawn Graham government to launch a non-refundable child tax credit to reduce personal income tax by up to $400 per child.

As well, the plan calls for a Universal Child Care Benefit that would annually pay parents $600 per child under the age of six.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (17)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

i Your a greedy person who has no problem passing the debt onto the next generation and you make me ill

ha ha Thanks. I enjoyed this one. By the way. My dad was a teacher. (now passed away) My sister is an RN. My mother is a senior.

And that wasn't my point at all. I have no problem with my fair share, Anonymous.

But sorry about your queezy stomach. Ginger works.
10
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Manique M., Saint John on 21/11/08 01:47:33 PM AST
I fear this committee has things backwards given the times. It has always held true that income tax cuts were better for the economy than consumption tax cuts because the savings on income would be used for investment and would ultimately create new production. Yet in this day and age (i.e. negative savings), those income tax cuts go to pay off previous spending. They will do nothing for future economic growth. This coupled with raising the consumption tax, which will decrease spending, seems to be an incompetent way to attempt to stimulate economic growth through taxation and ridiculously naive given the current economic situation.

I would also point out the sheer hypocrisy of a government claiming they want to become self-sufficient looking to cut revenues it can earn on its own. But of course, anyone thinking the "self-sufficiency" or "tax reform" campaigns are anything more than relabeling of the same old tired government we have become accustomed to in NB is deluded.


9
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Sue Park, Fredericton on 21/11/08 04:59:38 PM AST
So if you encourage savings and investment by raising consumption taxes then will somebody tell me how I will benefit?

We saved and invested while our friends went south every year and led lives we quite frankly envied.

Now we make just enough to be excluded from all the social programs available to those same people while simultaneously watching our investments vanish into some crooked banker's pocket.

My advice to young people if the Liberals go ahead with this gouging - start running west and don't stop until the Quebec border is far in the rearview mirror.
6
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Ron W., Lower Queensbury on 21/11/08 10:39:52 PM AST
I hear you Ron W.
It's too late for me, but I swear I'll sell everything I own and give the money to my son so he can get the hell out of here and live a better life out west.
7
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
J B, Riverview on 21/11/08 10:48:06 PM AST
I find it amusing that Liberal supporters of today are saying that cutting the GST was a dumb thing to do and most support raising it. Is this the same group who in 1993 critized the GST and called it the evil tory tax and said it should be eliminated. Remember when your beloved Chretian campigned on the promise of eliminating the GST entirely. This of course winning him a sweeping majority. Yet now when a conservsative government reduces it the liberal supporters start bashing them saying they caused the deficit etc.

Wrong! Stupid ideas like the gun registry, cancelling the EH 101 to buy the same chopper under a different name for more money, and lets not forget the sponsorship scandal. These are the things that causes deficits, not tax cuts. get your head out of the sand people.

i thing a flat tax is a brilliant idea seeing as we all get the same level of g
6
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Joe Doucette, Hampton on 22/11/08 12:00:38 PM AST
Cont,d
Seeing as we all get the same level of government service i think it is only fair that we all pay the same tax rates. Is it any coincedence that the people who pay the least amount of taxes ( the poor as everyone refers to them as) usually are the ones who use the governmnt services the most.

Funny thing when i file my income taxes i pay 41% on every dollar i earn. Yet i have to wait in the same lineup as the person who pays no income tax at the hospital. i have to drive on the same roads, and my children will attend the same school as the children of someone who pays no income taxes. If i call an ambulance i get the same service as someone paying less than 10% income tax. So someone please explain to me how that is fair.

Consumption taxes are fair but different rates of income taxes are not. So rather then study this topic to death just impliment it and be done with it. Hong kong has a flat income tax rate and are very successful as do about 27 other countries.
5
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Joe Doucette, Hampton on 22/11/08 12:12:33 PM AST
Fasinating stuff reading all the comments. No consensus at all, yet everyone believes they have the solution. If we ... meaning "we" do not learn how to share - be that resources or vision - we are toast.

The past thirty years has been a climate of competing needs - my cause or idea is better than yours. We entrench this by coming to public forums with a desire to deliver our particular message.

The noise is deafening ... just read these comments in sequence to get a taste.

What we forget in accepting the framework of competing needs is that we are talking to ourselves, our neighbours, and our extended families. We are talking about us!

Maybe if we changed the framework, talked about all the things we do have - human resources, talent, ideas, money - and talk about how to build a better community. Maybe we should learn to share the vision and work together. We have lots, we need to get our act together.

Final note, on politics, about 46% of us do not vote!
4
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Dennis Atchison, Fredericton on 26/11/08 03:44:39 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles