Committee backs flat tax on income

Published Friday November 21st, 2008
A1

FREDERICTON - A committee studying proposed changes to the provincial tax code will soon recommend the Liberals implement a flat income tax rate, boost the HST and slash the province's corporate tax rate - all while giving the boot to the notion of a carbon tax.

Click to Enlarge
Ben Shingler/Telegraph-Journal
Auguste Gallant, spokesman for the New Brunswick Fair Tax Coalition, speaks to the media Thursday in Fredericton during a protest of the Liberal government's proposed tax reforms.

The bi-party committee examining the taxation issue largely concluded its business Thursday. A draft of the committee's final report was leaked to the Telegraph-Journal and a member of the group later confirmed minor changes that were made during Thursday's final editing session.

The end document, which will soon be presented to Finance Minister Victor Boudreau and tabled in the legislature, will recommend the government execute a flat income tax rate of 10 per cent.

Such a move, states the report, would simplify the tax system and give New Brunswick the lowest overall personal income tax rate in Canada.

The committee, which held public consultations on the Liberal tax proposals this summer, says the flat tax was heartily endorsed.

The document also calls on the Liberals to chop the general corporate income tax rate to five per cent from 13 per cent, which would make it equal to the current small-business tax rate.

Ottawa has challenged the provinces to lower their corporate tax rates to 10 per cent, to match Alberta - home of the country's lowest provincial corporate tax rate.

But the committee argues New Brunswick should push further to improve the local climate for business and capital investment.

And then there's the idea of a carbon tax.

When the Liberals unveiled their potential reforms back in June, the plan was immediately blasted for its mention of such a measure. Not surprisingly, the committee calls for government to ignore the tax, which would be levied on carbon fuels and emissions.

According to the committee, a carbon tax would put the province at a competitive disadvantage because of its heavy reliance on fossil fuels for electrical generation. The report notes that 58 per cent of electricity in the province comes from sources that would be subject to the tax.

A carbon tax, it concludes, requires more study.

But the lack of a carbon tax creates a problem: how to fund the personal and corporate tax cuts.

The original Liberal plan claimed the cuts - up to $500 million a year - would be funded through the carbon tax and a boost to the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST).

The HST, it was proposed, could be put back to 15 per cent - an increase of two percentage points.

However, while the tax committee recommends a boost to the HST, it doesn't specify by how much. The report just says government should increase it to offset the corporate and personal tax cuts - meaning it could go above 15 per cent.

"The options for restructuring our tax system are very limited without another source of revenue," concludes the report of life without a carbon tax.

Still, the paper argues there must be HST protection for low-income earners and seniors, who spend a higher percentage of their earnings on taxable goods.

So the committee recommends a rebate program, similar to federal GST rebate, to lessen the impact on low-income earners.

Property taxes were also a major concern during the committee's summer hearings. The report describes the current setup as "regressive and inequitably imposed."

It also chides the "unexpected and escalating assessments" that New Brunswickers face.

So, Boudreau will be told to reduce the non-residential property tax rate from $2.25 to $1.50 per every $100 of assessed property value.

And, the committee says, the Liberals should reduce the $1.50 tax (per $100 assessed property value) on residential properties not occupied by the owner, such as apartment buildings.

As well, says the report, the Grits should extend the $0.65 tax rate to all types of properties in local service districts and impose a three-year average assessment value on property.

Committee head Roly MacIntyre concludes that the tax changes should be made gradually over five years.

On Thursday the Saint John East MLA told reporters it will require "major guts" to actually implement the measures.

Opposition critic Bruce Fitch says the plan is all wrong.

The Riverview MLA said raising the HST will be harmful to low-income earners who already pay less than 10 per cent income tax.

Fitch also opposes the deep corporate tax cut - as long as the small-business tax remains unchanged at five per cent.

The committee report also calls on the Shawn Graham government to launch a non-refundable child tax credit to reduce personal income tax by up to $400 per child.

As well, the plan calls for a Universal Child Care Benefit that would annually pay parents $600 per child under the age of six.

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (17)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

We are a lower middle class family with children...the changes above would cause us to pay more tax.

When I studied Tax at University we were told that sales taxes were the least progressive tax as it taxed lower income folks more than higher income folks. Granted it according to this article there will be measures put in place to offset this...but that seems to complicate things rather than simplify things which is what they say they are going to do.

Personally I think a carbon tax would be a good idea. We need to move away from fossil fuels. If we are to be known as an Energy province we need to move into clean green energy...instead this gov't is imposing dirty energy on us...and getting us to take the dirty part of energy headed for the U.S.

We need change...I hope the Conservatives can supply it.
27
Thumbs Up
16
Thumbs Down
Smalltown NB, New Brunswick on 21/11/08 06:49:51 AM AST
The committee is
hand picked by the government,
in tax brackets that will benifit the most from the income tax changes,
have the wherewithall to travel and shop outside the province and avoid sales tax increases,
...all this and the committee recomends what thier masters want...I'm shocked...never saw this comming...can you say"rubber stamp"
18
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
d g, saint john on 21/11/08 06:59:13 AM AST
Well I can certainly see how this would benefit the wealthy but certainly not the low and mid income people. Quel surprise. Au revoir liberals. I'll be turning in my card now.
28
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Manique M., Saint John on 21/11/08 07:33:32 AM AST
Does the word Bi-Party fit into any of your vocabularies? So since its a BI-PARTY committee you automatically think that its the Shawn Graham Liberals who are doing this.

Maybe the increase in literacy did not reach any of the above posters as they have no properly read the article......


Think a HST hike is actually good. It hurts the low income earners but for petes sake is anyone of you richer with that extra 1% you saved since July 07? and the extra 1% in January?

Manique go ahead turn your card in, I bet you've been using this threat so much its starting to sound like a broken record.

At least this government is trying to stimulate where as the Tories just stood put after the 100 days of disastrous change........ You can blame the Tories and their toll taking ways for the shape NB is in now.
16
Thumbs Up
30
Thumbs Down
D Ann, Around NB on 21/11/08 07:47:56 AM AST
Actually no. My frustration is recent. And if it makes you feel better, I'll blame both parties.
15
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Manique M., Saint John on 21/11/08 07:56:03 AM AST
Why not try and take the partisanship out of the discussion? Let's talk about how much taxes we all pay, The bottom line for me, is, When all these changes take place, will I be paying more tax, or will I be paying less tax? I expect most people are looking at it the same way.

It is without a doubt that everybody can't pay less tax and the government continue to maintain the public service and the programs it provides, so it is probably safe to say most of us will end up paying more tax if costs for healthcare, education and to cover the large spending increases this government has made since their election to government.

Then the final question, how are they going to collect the tax;income, sales,property, corporate, etc. I, for one, will keep an open mind. I am deeply suspicious of the "Corporate" mentality that is within the Liberal gang in power right now, but if the most of the changes make sense, I would not be against tax reform.


13
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
D. Breeze, Bathurst on 21/11/08 08:51:40 AM AST
What about a progressive carbon tax? Right now the price of Gas and oil is falling. The lower the price of oil falls the higher the carbon tax. However, if the price of oil increases, for example to levels like earlier this year, then the carbon tax would decrease. That way our province can collect the taxes revenue that it needs without hurting the people.

Just a thought anway....
7
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Alex Scott, Saint John on 21/11/08 10:47:06 AM AST
I have to laugh...out loud! Brian Mulroney was boosted out of office and is still a joke among all of you liberals out there for implementing the GST, and with reason I might add, now according to these comments I read, most of you want the HST (agreed on by your beloved Mr. McKenna) higher, how much higher do you want to go? For the love of God, New Brunswick has the population of Quebec City, give your heads a good shake and wake up. You will never have everything with a 10% flat tax, plus nobody will move to New Brunswick "to enjoy" doing business at a 5% corporate tax, it is too far and not enough of a population. Plus, are we not almost in a recession? Wrong time, wrong place to do it! Sorry folks, find alternatives.
14
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
nicole berube, Kingston, ON on 21/11/08 10:49:51 AM AST
I have a question that nobody has raised yet. With all the new programs for people paying no tax and other low income people, which I approve of the idea, how many more civil servants will we need. We already have twice the nuber of civil servants (tier 1) than the average for other canadian provinces, we have 41% more civil servants than Nov Scotia. Now, what I see in this plan is hiring even more. Instead of increasing the HST, have a reduction of the bureaucracy and save $300 million. For those that think it can't be done, that is what the Federal Liberals did between 1993-1995 and you didn't even notice it. Further, there is no need to reduce the income tax on large corporations to 5%. That is not what will attract them to NB. Also, the flat tax of 10% is regressive. A proressive rate is much fairer. Do away with the flat tax, reduce tax on all corporations by 3%, reduce the bureaucracy and do not increase the HST. This works financially and is better for all.
12
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
J. R, Moncton, NB on 21/11/08 11:03:44 AM AST
i Your a greedy person who has no problem passing the debt onto the next generation and you make me ill

ha ha Thanks. I enjoyed this one.
7
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Manique M., Saint John on 21/11/08 01:43:42 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles