Sprinter fails in quest to overturn ban

Published Saturday July 19th, 2008
C11

LONDON - British sprinter Dwain Chambers failed Friday in his bid to overturn a lifetime Olympic ban because of doping, and will not be able to compete at the Beijing Games.

Click to Enlarge
AP
Dwain Chambers, centre, reacts as he wins the 100 meters final during the Norwich Union Olympic Trials at the Alexander Stadium in Birmingham, England on July 12.

London's High Court refused to grant an injunction against the British Olympic Association's bylaw which bans doping violators for life from the games. Chambers' legal team said it would not appeal the decision.

"The judge has made his decision," Chambers said.

The sprinter did not comment on possible retirement plans. His lawyer suggested in court Thursday that Chambers was likely to retire if he lost the case.

Chambers, who won the 100-metre race at last Saturday's British Olympic trials in 10 seconds, served a two-year ban after testing positive for the steroid THG in August 2003.

The BOA, which is expected to announce its final sprint squad Saturday ahead of Sunday's deadline, said it would not seek to be reimbursed for its costs.

Despite ruling against Chambers, Judge Colin Mackay criticized the bylaw.

"People both inside and outside sport would see this bylaw as unlawful," Mackay said.

The BOA has asked its Anti-Doping Commission to undertake a review of the bylaw in conjunction with the independent British Athletes Commission.

"Today has strengthened our resolve that it's the right approach but we also want to make sure we are reflecting the athletes' wishes," BOA chairman Colin Moynihan said. "I don't believe today will change that bylaw but we need to keep it under review."

The World Anti-Doping Agency said the verdict reinforced its decision to strengthen sanctions for serious doping violations.

"This decision sends a strong message that athletes who commit serious doping violations will have to face significant consequences," WADA president John Fahey said. "There will continue to be no tolerance for cheaters in sport."

Chambers would have been eligible to compete if only International Olympic Committee rules applied.

"We now consider the issue closed and look forward to Beijing and turn all our focus to our final preparations of the athletes who will represent Great Britain," UK Athletics spokeswoman Claire Furlong said.

In his deliberation, however, Mackay highlighted the new IOC rule, which came into effect July 1 but is not retroactive, banning athletes from the following Olympics if they have received a drug suspension of at least six months.

"We welcome the court's judgment," IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies said. "We believe in a zero tolerance approach to athletes who take banned drugs."

Mackay said Chambers had little chance of winning a medal in Beijing and that it would be unfair to deny an opportunity for athletes who had never taken drugs, upsetting the harmony of the team.

He also said athletes in other sports could make their own appeal if Chambers won his bid, such as cyclist David Millar and shot putter Carl Myerscough, who have both served doping bans.

"Many people both inside and outside sport would see this bylaw as unlawful," Mackay said. "In my judgment it would take a much better case than the claimant has presented to persuade me to overturn the status quo at this stage and compel his selection for the games."

Mackay said Chambers' argument of restraint of trade would be unlikely to succeed at a full trial, even if he could argue that there are indirect financial benefits from appearing at the amateur event.

"His 10-second time achieved last weekend is confronted by the fact that there will be nine other athletes in Beijing who have run a faster time this year," Mackay said.

Mackay noted that Chambers only issued the proceeding against the BOA at the "11th hour" on July 3, meaning that the time to assimilate the arguments was limited.

The arguments were digested in court in a one-day hearing Thursday. They were earlier submitted in written form.

The BOA had argued that if Chambers succeeded, the British team's reputation would be tarnished and London's ability to deliver the 2012 Games would be impaired because sponsors would be unwilling to invest.

Chambers briefly returned to the track in 2006 after serving his two-year ban and pursued an alternative - but ultimately unsuccessful - foray into American football.

Despite returning to athletics in March and winning a silver medal in the 60 at the World Indoors, he had a one-month experiment with rugby league and after being released by the Castleford Tigers he pursued the legal route to Beijing.

Mackay ruled last Thursday that there is not enough time to hear the full case until after the Beijing Games, but it is unlikely the 30-year-old Chambers would have any need to pursue that.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles