N.B. can still minimize the population crash

Published Tuesday December 1st, 2009
A7

Immigration is said to be the key tool to fight the prospects of an aging population. While reversing youth outmigration would improve the demographic outlook in New Brunswick, even dramatic reversals in migration patterns cannot, on their own, counteract the impact of the province's greying boomers on living standards and public finances.

The prospect of a rapidly aging population means that New Brunswick must follow a suite of policies, such as those to boost investments in workers and pre-fund some government programs, to dampen the costs of slower workforce growth and rising health care needs.

How powerful are these demographic forces? Suppose long-term outmigration trends in New Brunswick continue, fertility stays constant, and longevity keeps improving at middle-of-the-road rates. Even if net interprovincial outmigration gradually declined to zero over the next 10 years and international migration continued at recent rates, the working-age population - the number of 18- to 64-year-olds - would shrink from 489,000 today to 462,000 in 2018, and a shocking 414,000 in 2028. The old-age dependency ratio - the share of the population aged 65 and up compared to those of working age - would more than double, from 23 per cent today to 48 per cent in 20 years' time.

Suppose, by contrast, that migration trends reverse: net international migration to New Brunswick expands to around 5,000 persons each year, up from the current level of 1,300, and interprovincial outmigration stops. The result: the working-age population would rise to 502,000 in 2018 and then plateau over the next 10 years, and the share of those aged 65 and up to the working age population would expand to around 40 per cent by 2028.

Clearly, more favourable migration patterns help. So one key task is to improve the prospects on that front.

One promising initiative is the creation of the Canadian Experience Class of immigrants, which facilitates the immigration of foreign students at post-secondary institutions. This requires the support and cooperation of universities and colleges, as they would play a much larger role in the immigrant screening process.

Without turning its back on rural regions that face unique challenges, the province also needs to exploit the virtues of its metropolitan centers, which seem to have more attraction power for immigrants than do its rural regions.

But even the more favourable migration scenario would see a stagnating workforce in the province and a historically unprecedented rise in the old-age dependency ratio. Because spending on public health care programs is strongly geared to age, this prospect threatens much higher tax bills - which, in turn, would make attracting and retaining potential migrants more difficult. So more is needed.

Here's a radical idea: pre-fund some elements of health services, such as pharmacare, which has recently been growing at 6 per cent annually. That is how Canada as a whole stabilized the cost of the Canada Pension Plan in the mid-1990s. If savings on money set aside today earn a return of 5 per cent each year, such a reform would stabilize drug spending at an affordable level of some $400 to $500 dollars per adult annually. Rein the growth of pharmacare spending back to around 4 per cent annually, and the cost of the program could be stabilized at no more than $200 per adult annually.

New Brunswick can also improve its attractiveness as a place to invest, in order to equip workers with better tools to do the job. Recent tax reforms are helping boost capital investment in the province, from $5,900 per worker in 2002 to $9,900 per worker in 2009. Yet New Brunswick still lags the national average of around $11,100 of new tools per worker this year, so it should do more.

Though politically sensitive, one necessary discussion is reform of programs that discourage people from moving where the jobs are. Federal programs, like regionally-linked EI benefits, continue to impede the intraregional movement of workers. Regional mobility in benefits would help this problem.

Another area where innovation is needed is in the literacy skills of adult workers. An estimated 56 per cent of New Brunswickers performed at the either the lowest or second-lowest level of literacy during the latest international adult literacy survey - the worst results among Canadian provinces. As workers switch jobs over their career, low investments in adult training will limit workers' adaptability, hindering the province's ability to cope with demographic change. Improving the acquisition and retention of skills by adults is therefore an important route to raise productivity and living standards, with the added benefit of limited outmigration pressures.

Reversing the migration trends in New Brunswick will help the challenge of an aging population. But this alone won't be enough to cope with the prospect of slowing workforce growth. Other policy initiatives, such as a more flexible and skilled workforce, must be pursued as well.

Pierre-Marcel Desjardins is a professor at Université de Moncton. He, Colin Busby and William B.P. Robson are authors of "Stress Test: Demographic Pressures and Policy Options in Atlantic Canada" at the C.D. Howe Institute. The paper can be found online at www.cdhowe.org.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I think we should do more to keep our own before we go getting others. However, there has been very little done in this respect.
10
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Miramichi ExPat, Halifax on 01/12/09 09:28:13 AM AST
Considering just two of the concerns mentioned here, literacy and out (or in) migration, how about that 800 lb gorilla in the (NB) room - mandated bilingualism? We saw the out-migration of the English from Que and they were a smaller % of the pop. At 2/3 in NB, any out-migration is even more significant. Que,which should be one of the wealthiest provinces in the country, has been the biggest recipient of equalization, so French is not the path to self-sufficiency now and certainly not in the future. All of this is not exactly rocket science.
So why bilingualism? It’s not to save the culture because the culture has survived for 300 years without it. It’s not that it’s an asset to business as proven by the Que situation and northern NB and the fact that 97% of our neighbours operate in English as does much of the business world. Que politicians held power through the church, so now has language replaced religion?
10
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
. MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 01/12/09 09:54:20 AM AST
Policies of bare foot and pregnant, to religion and now language are simply for political power , not the betterment of the people. What responsible leader would want to keep his people confined to a language ghetto other than to keep them insecure and dependent?
In Que, 2/3 are unilingual French and in northern NB the % is much the same, after 30 years of bilingualism. Think of the number of politicians who got elected based on language and the insecurity that goes with it. I would have thought that responsible leaders would make sure all of their people would be able function in the dominant language of their neighbours(97%) and of business. Other power players, China and India being two, are making sure their people can compete in English. We tell immigrants that they can come and keep their cultural but not their language ? So why all the conflicts in logic and common sense?

8
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
. MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 01/12/09 10:01:58 AM AST


Many current foreign conflicts and revolutions were due to minorities controlling gov’t. Is this the future gamble that we want to leave for our kids? Also wishing for more immigrants of major proportion may be something else future generations could also regret. The ‘current’ generation of French and English should be more compatible than any from other countries. The basics of peace, order and good gov’t is what both peoples want but if political leaders continue to play on “tribal ties” or “race/language” issues, we may have more to worry about than a shrinking pop.


"There is no way two ethnic groups in one country can be made equal
before the law....and to say it is possible is to sow the seeds of
destruction".
Pierre Trudeau, 1966
9
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
. MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 01/12/09 10:04:25 AM AST
Here's a thought. Make it affordable to have children.
Have you seen the cost of daycare, formula, diapers, and baby clothes?
10
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
J B, Riverview on 01/12/09 11:58:55 AM AST
JB, I agree. That could be done through Harpers day care allowance or whatever it was called. The Feds could boost it and the province could match it. It would cost money but so does immigration.
3
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
. MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 01/12/09 01:57:56 PM AST
BTW, who would want to come to a province or country where language police roam the streets? I suspose it could be worst, it could be religious police, whether it was in Que.tracking down the JWs or in Saudi Arabia, looking for sinners.
1
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
. MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 01/12/09 06:20:52 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles