Olympics highlight failure of federal policy

Published Thursday November 26th, 2009
A11

As the Olympic Flame crosses the country, French-speaking Canadian citizens are still pondering to what extent they will be able to enjoy this event in their language - one of the official languages of Canada.

There is reason for concern: in September, Graham Fraser, Commissioner of Official Languages, reported that our airports - particularly in Vancouver and Toronto - are not prepared to welcome visitors in both official languages.

Security screenings, Air Canada, shops and services, and the airport authorities themselves all get alarming results in terms of their ability to serve the public in both languages.

It is ironic that right on the heels of the 40th anniversary of the Official Languages Act - a bill which was enacted to promote the equality of French and English in Canada - Commissioner Fraser should highlight such a blatant case of language inequality. It is also baffling that four decades later, federal institutions such as these airports should scramble at the last minute - because they are suddenly under the spotlight - to devise quick fixes to comply with their long-standing legal obligation to serve our citizens in the official language of their choice.

How did it come to that?

Part of the problem is that after 40 years of weak political and administrative will to act on official languages policy, several federal institutions have fallen into the habit of doing only the strict minimum required by law - and often even less - in terms of complying with their language obligations toward Canadian citizens. Little by little, we have forgotten about the spirit and the intent of the Official Languages Act: true equality between French and English, the promotion of both official languages of Canada and the development of official language minority communities. Those are the very principles that are negated whenever citizens can't get services from the federal government in the official language of their choice.

Any approach that loses sight of what the Official Languages Act really intended is and always will be doomed to failure. This is why the organization I represent, an organization which speaks on behalf of more than a million French speakers in nine provinces and three territories, will be releasing a proposal this week for a sweeping reform of how official language policy is implemented in Canada.

In the Olympic spirit, we can do better. Instead of more quick fixes or sticking to doing the strict minimum, let's go back to the spirit and intent of what we were trying to do for this country when we adopted the Official Languages Act four decades ago and resolve the issues once and for all.

Marie-France Kenny of Ottawa is President of Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne du Canada.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (5)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

You raise a good point Ms. Kenny, perhaps it's time to review the languages act, obviously there are not enough people to provide bilingual service, all the time. You say you represent more than 1 million french speakers, well, that leaves 32 million non french speakers... the problem seems obvious. As for the government not doing enough, please, ask any person that lost a job or a promotion to the job posting that said "bilingual preferred". Ask the tax payers of New Brunswick if their money is being well spent on all the duplication required, french schools, french hospitals etc. I think the government has bent over backward to please such a small percentage of the population, and still they are not happy.
20
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
lucky duck, hampton on 26/11/09 08:27:52 AM AST
When in the province of Quebec I have no expectation of service in English. When in Alberta I have no expectation of service in French. What galls me is that in areas of New Brunswick I am to either expect bilingual service in most of the province or French only in other areas. The official languages act has not worked. It has only divided our province.
20
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Colin H., Saint John on 26/11/09 08:48:50 AM AST
I would say that the greatest failure of the adoption of the OL Act was that it did not change the mentality of some anglophones who still do not see francophones as equals and don't think they are entitled to equality in services. I think it's sad that those people refuse to acknowledge the concept of two founding nations of this country. They seem to see french as an exotic, elitist language, which isn't really necessary to get through life even if it is the mother tongue of 1 million Canadians and 1/3 of New Brunswickers. Only when we will have convinced these people that french is very much a part of canadian culture and life, and that it deserves an equal status with english will we truly reach equality. Most of the time, it is not laws that need to be changed, but mentalities, and that can take quite a while...
3
Thumbs Up
16
Thumbs Down
A C, Moncton on 26/11/09 09:30:48 AM AST
Just get Dieppe city hall on this, they'll have olympics in english illegal in a week.
13
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
J B, Riverview on 26/11/09 10:25:31 AM AST
Well at least we all agree the official languages act is a failure, and A.C. in moncton, I don't see the french as elitist and exotic, I see them as whiny and selfish. Also, how do you expect equality when you are so outnumbered?
13
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
lucky duck, hampton on 26/11/09 01:14:04 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles