Hey, Danny -deal with it

Published Wednesday October 28th, 2009
A10

Premier Shawn Graham has written a diplomatic response to Newfoundland leader Danny Williams, defending New Brunswick's negotiations with Hydro-Quebec. The person on the street has a shorter, sharper rebuke: mind your own business.

The same could be said to Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter, who has echoed Mr. Williams' comments.

Newfoundland and Nova Scotia have done everything they can to exploit energy assets, and New Brunswick has tried to do likewise - more often than not, hampered by the federal government and such self-serving "regionalists" as Mr. Williams. New Brunswickers aren't moved by Mr. Williams' prima donna routine. He should save it for remarks aimed at Ottawa.

New Brunswick has little to learn from Newfoundland or Nova Scotia on the subject of energy. Neither province owns the utility that serves its citizens, and neither has made a comparable public investment in getting their power to market. Moreover, neither has supported New Brunswick politically when energy agreements were being hammered out at the federal level.

Where were Newfoundland and Nova Scotia when New Brunswick was shut out of the Atlantic Accord? Or when legislators sought federal support for the refurbishment of Point Lepreau? Where are they now on the issue of compensation for refurbishment delays?

New Brunswick and P.E.I. could have used some regional support in these pitched discussions. Mr. Williams has been too busy lobbying and threatening the federal government to pay much heed to what his neighbours might require - and regional energy policy is showing the strain.

Ottawa has offered little support for New Brunswick's efforts to create an energy hub, despite its regional impact. New Brunswick was actually left out of the federal announcement of funding for an Atlantic energy gateway. And the federal response to the costly delays at Point Lepreau has been to suggest that NB Power should sue if it wants compensation. This shows disrespect for the ratepayers of New Brunswick and P.E.I.

Mr. Williams' bellyaching is not about the regional or national interest. It's about who will take the largest share of New England's energy market.

This province has something of value to trade - its electrical grid and proximity to the United States. Distance is Mr. Williams' big liability, and it won't be resolved by throwing a temper tantrum.

Evidently, Hydro-Quebec has realized that negotiating with New Brunswick could pay dividends to both provinces. Is Mr. Williams angry because he didn't think of this first - or is he just opposed to the idea of competition?

 

Comments (18)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Again an unsigned editorial from the "Irving Press". Those who benefit the most from the planned deal seem to be its only supporters and those who know we will get screwed by it line Me. Williams are its loudest critics...go figure..


I say again Mr. Graham bring it to the people and let us decide..man up and call the election.
60
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Rural Curmudgeon, Sussex on 28/10/09 07:43:32 AM AST
It would be a referendum he would call in any case...not an election.
33
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
20 something woman, Fredericton on 28/10/09 08:21:37 AM AST
I agree w/ Rural Curmudgeon. Danny Williams had the bravery to stand up and say his piece. The Irvings hit him back from behind the anonymity of the editorial board.

Thank god we have the CBC to provide impartial coverage of this debate.
56
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
John McLane, Nashwaaksis on 28/10/09 08:29:31 AM AST
Um, an editorial by its very nature is unsigned. I'm sorry you fail to understand how newspapers work.
25
Thumbs Up
33
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Tom Landry, fredericton on 28/10/09 08:51:58 AM AST
"The person on the street has a shorter, sharper rebuke: mind your own business."

I love when the Irving media puts words in the mouths of the "person on the street."

ANYONE I've talked to says this is BAD news, I have not heard one defender of selling our utility to Quebec.

Perhaps before writing these pronouncements, Irving should actually CHECK with the people on the street.
53
Thumbs Up
15
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
M T, Hampton on 28/10/09 09:06:51 AM AST
Tom Landry- Many other newspapers, including our very own Acadie Nouvelle, sign their editorials.

If Brunswick News intends to use their newspapers to sway public opinion, at least be up front about it.

I thought wafer-gate would have taught Jamie Irving to keep his nose out of politics.
41
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
John McLane, Nashwaaksis on 28/10/09 09:13:52 AM AST
No, 20 something woman, it would be an election to see if Mr. Graham had the backing of the people to proceed with his plan. A referendum would only waste more tax dollars as the election is scheduled for Sept.2010 and referendum rules in NB mean it would be held at the next Municipal election and if I remember, that is the only time NBers can have a referendum, but I'm sure if I remember wrong, it will be pointed out to me.

A move this important can't be shoved down our throats when the mandate has less than a year to go.


Either call the election now or suspend talks till after the next provincial election and then and only then will the government of the day have the mandate to negotiate away our energy future.

Maybe Mr. Williams will offer us more for NBPower than Quebec Hydro was prepared to offer. Courting both may realize bigger gains.
27
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Rural Curmudgeon, Sussex on 28/10/09 09:35:55 AM AST
That may as well have been signed by Greasy, Gassy and/or Oily for that matter, it is plain to see who will benefit the most from this deal.
24
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Rural Curmudgeon, Sussex on 28/10/09 09:38:14 AM AST
Those who put down Danny are scared of him and someone like him taking power in NB. God forbid NB politicians would stick up for the people instead of offering a deal where Quebec can use the profits from NB to fincnace sepratism.
29
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Miramichi ExPat, Halifax on 28/10/09 09:51:03 AM AST
Newfoundland and Nova Scotia live with the misery of short-sighted, political blunders: Churchill Falls in NL and the sell-off of Nova Scotia Power in NS. What was once a Crown Corp. motivated by serving the public including a properly maintained system is now driven by profit for shareholders, which is why a mild storm can now knock out power over wide areas in NS. Parent company Emera will drive in its crews from Maine (if they aren't needed at home) to help deal with outages rather than maintain resources in NS. Hydro-Quebec could do likewise. The editorial says NB has something of value to trade. How Hydro-Quebec would benefit is obvious but the benefit to NB citizens is mighty obscure. Danny Williams may be an arrogant SOB but he is undeniably a successful businessman as well as politician, and his warnings about the folly of this deal should not be dismissed in such cavalier fashion. Once a deal is signed, there's no turning back.
28
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
D Reed, Saint John on 28/10/09 10:39:25 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles