A tempest in a ciborium?

Published Friday July 10th, 2009
A7

I'm not sure that it will receive as many hits as Abraham Zapruder's film footage of John F. Kennedy being shot, or Susan Boyle's rendition of "I Dreamed a Dream," but video footage of Prime Minister Stephen Harper receiving the Holy Eucharist at Romeo Leblanc's funeral last week managed to send the Internet into a tizzy just as things were winding down from the Michael Jackson funeral. In the future it may be known as "The clip that launched a thousand blog entries!"

Click to Enlarge
The Canadian Press
Pallbearers from the Royal Canadian Regiment carry the flag-draped casket of the former governor general, Romeo LeBlanc, in Saint Thomas Church in Memramcook on July 3. Governor General Michaëlle Jean, her husband Jean-Daniel Lafond and Prime Minister Stephen Harper, right, look on.

I would have missed the "scandal" entirely if I hadn't gone for my morning Tim's and run into a Liberal colleague, who chuckled, "We're going to force for an election over this!"

"What now?" I asked, with a pained expression.

"It seems your leader took communion in your church."

I didn't need to rush back to my office and add my name to the list of hits on the CPAC website. I knew exactly what he was talking about. The prime minister of Canada, a Protestant and member of the Christian and Missionary Alliance Church, had been invited to the funeral mass of Romeo Leblanc, a former governor general and a Catholic. He attended the mass out of respect for the family and had probably been seated in the front row (as protocol dictates); had probably been offered communion by the celebrant and had accepted it trying to be polite, unfamiliar with the subtleties of Catholic canon law.

Perhaps his protocol officer should have advised him on the distinctions between substantiation and transubstantiation (why else, after all, does Heritage Canada keep these people on the payroll?); the importance of the sacrament to the church; or how to respond if the celebrant came to him and offered him communion. In fact, he may even have been advised on all this and forgotten when the moment came. Who knows what else may have been on his mind when the priest approached his pew? (For the record, a Canadian soldier had been killed that morning in Afghanistan.)

One thing is certain, though; his protocol officer surely could not have advised that if he slipped up on the rituals of the Catholic Church, he would be criticized in the public square by officials of the very same church - the one that invited him to attend the funeral service.

Politics is a funny business sometimes, but there really are times when I wonder why a politician even bothers to get out of bed. The PM, for all his good intentions, wound up being accused of purloining a consecrated host by one New Brunswick cleric, while another raised the issue of sacrilege.

Please!

Mr. Harper's alleged faux pas, if it is to be called that, managed to take the lead over war in Afghanistan, the faltering economy, and even his pending visit with Pope Benedict as a news story. (Ironically, Mr. Harper's beliefs are probably more in line with those of the Pontiff than many other leaders who actually are Catholic). No wonder they call summer the "silly season" in the news business.

This past week has not been an easy one for the prime minister. He eulogized a friend and former colleague who, laid low by depression, took his own life at the age of 39. He came to New Brunswick to attend the funeral of a man he had great respect for but little personal connection with, to a church full of political adversaries and to a religious service with which he was likely unfamiliar. In return, he was unfairly and publicly rebuked for unconsciously breaking one of the church's rules.

One of the foundations of the Catholic Church is its unyielding stance on the Holy Eucharist throughout the ages, the belief that Christ is present in its form, and the belief that only Catholics in good grace should receive it. Notwithstanding, another tenet of the church, perhaps unwritten, is simple charity: kindness towards others, especially those who may not share the same beliefs as oneself.

These past few days I have thought a lot about my church and my leader. When I was growing up, my best friend and I didn't discuss religion very often. She was a devout Baptist, and I a practising Catholic. We never attended each other's church, but when I got married, she stood up beside me at the altar. On the pillar of the cathedral was a banner which read, "We Open Our Hearts to You." She glanced over and commented "That's very welcoming." I remember feeling good about the fact that my church had taken time to make everyone welcome.

The Catholic Church has every right to deny someone the ability to share in the Holy Eucharist, but it also has an obligation to make people of all faiths feel welcome. Somehow, the message it sent out to the community this week was anything but.

Lisa Keenan of Saint John is a lawyer and the former president of the New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Party. Her column appears on Friday.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (8)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Yet more energy and time wasted on cracker-eating behaviour.

The man was trying to be respectful, not disrespectful, and let's face it: We are talking about one man and one cracker.

Why do religions get to cry offense over EVERYTHING? Only a religion could cry foul over improper cracker handling and make national news, bumping out all the other good things in the world and drawing attention away from real issues that need addressing.

Ridiculous.
20
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
T S., Quispamsis on 10/07/09 07:12:05 AM AST
We should do what the Roman Catholic church has done with its offenders in the past, lets ship Harper off to another country and switch PMs with them.

Case closed.
4
Thumbs Up
16
Thumbs Down
Thereis Nogod, Saint John on 10/07/09 10:19:23 AM AST
Who cares???????????????//
9
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
joe blow, moncton on 10/07/09 10:54:10 AM AST
One thing for sure, any non-Catholic politician will think twice before going to any publicized Catholic service. He can easily find himself in a no-win situation over issues that even the Catholics can't agree on.

As for shipping out Harper for an off shore one, I wonder who Nogod had in mind?I did think that people were coming to Canada to get away from some of their home grown PMs.

Give Harper a chance and he’ll be the best PM for Canadians that Canada ever had.

"The media is our problem"
8
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
. MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 10/07/09 12:24:47 PM AST
Imagine if the TG editor was hit by a truck and ended up in heaven and was greeted by Romeo. What would the editor say when asked how the highlights of Romeo's funeral were reported and what were people saying about it across Canada. I’m sure Jamie would be too ashamed to say that he, with some help from the Church, crucified Harper good.

Let’s face it, the Catholic Church has never supported non-Catholic Prime Ministers and that is why there have been so few. (Harper the only one in my life time). Maybe the days are gone when the Priest comes right out and tells the faithful how to vote but old habits die hard. So, the sooner they can get rid of this protestant Harper, the better.

On the other hand, can anyone imagine a Catholic PM under similar circumstances, being crucified in a Protestant church because of a possible and certainly unintended faux pas.
I doubt that such a thing would happen in a Mosque, so what does that say about Christianity as practiced by some.
8
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
LEONARD MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 10/07/09 06:36:06 PM AST
Raised Catholic let me say: The worst PM's in history have been of catholic backgroundand God can deal with that. They did not demonstrate fidelity to Christianity nor catholicism but brought in laws that forever changed history and the moral (immoral) life in Canada. Bishops sat back approving, and condoned annulments at wealthy gatherings, attended the weddings, rubbed noses with the elite, said nothing about the PM's practises. Likewise today. Bishops like the Miter and Crozier but lack the testosterone and guts to stand in the shoes of Christ amd make the hard decisions. As such, many despise them secretly and go to other faiths. I don't know what Monseignor Henneberry observed but I do know he'll stand alone while others aspire to the Nuncio for cudos from their public approval. My relationship with the Living God in His unqualified convenant relationship transcends denominationalism and I can stand alone if necessary and say, the Jesus I know is unconditional truth & love.
8
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
michael d., St. Stephen on 10/07/09 08:15:07 PM AST
Kudos to Lisa Keenan for sharing her thoughts on this public hanging. The Archbishop of Moncton came out today & said the PM should not have taken Communion. In future, he should make sure that he trains his priests to add all Christians welcome to Communion as long as you're Catholic. One could not blame the non-Catholic politicians or anyone else for boycotting services in which we will be judged & ridiculed whether in public or behind our backs in the sanctuary & in the pews if one of us inadvertently takes Communion when it is openly offered as the priest individually & personally did to our PM. The Archbishop of Moncton, Monsignor Henneberry & their supporters have managed to demonstrate legalism, petty politics, poisonous personal judgements & hypocrisy all in one week-not Christian behaviour.They obviously don't understand what Communion is.This is a public witch hunt on a new low. These church "leaders" should be ashamed of themselves & they should publicly apologize to our PM.
14
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
trust is earned, Saint John on 11/07/09 12:21:49 AM AST
Ms Keenan is contradicted by Senator Kinsella, a Conservative. He stated he has attended other Catholic services with Mr Harper and Mr Harper did not partake of the communion. So, why did he do it this time. Because the national media was present and he wanted the publicity. What Mr Harper did was use a sacred sacrement to get publicity for himself. He got his publicity and he deserved it. His action was entirely in accordance with the man who has no respect for anybody.
3
Thumbs Up
15
Thumbs Down
J. R, Moncton, NB on 11/07/09 11:19:55 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles