Less duplication, more investment

Published Saturday July 4th, 2009
A10

A persistent complaint about economic development is that too much infrastructure has produced too little impact. Funding agencies at the regional, provincial and federal levels seem to work at cross purposes, and it's not unusual for entrepreneurs to feel lost.

That could change, if a reform initiative pays off. Led by the Enterprise Network, New Brunswick's local, provincial and national development organizations are talking about ways to eliminate overlap.

It is imperative that these groups create a single entry-point system that is timely, professional and easy for businesses to access. The federal and provincial governments don't have money to waste, and aspiring entrepreneurs don't have the time or resources to apply to multiple agencies. They'd rather be building their businesses.

Streamlining the funding application process is a necessary part of moving from government-centred development to business-centred development. The alphabet soup of competing organizations is a natural product of the notion that government can create economic activity. Is joblessness a problem? Create a department of training. Are small businesses having difficulty accessing credit? Create an agency to help them out. The intentions of these initiatives have been good, but the results haven't measured up.

Fortunately, a changing economy is changing perspectives. Governments running deficits need to pay more attention to the outcome of investments; and new business leaders are pointing out ways in which development agencies have failed to take real-world conditions into account.

The Enterprise Network and its partners must shift focus, putting business back at the centre of economic development decisions. If funding doesn't create jobs, taxes or another definable return, it isn't a defensible investment.

Replace the baffling acronyms with a single entry-point system, in which a business applying to any agency gets information about all available funding programs. Place economic considerations, such as equity and return on investment, above partisan or parochial politics. Strip away layers of paperwork, until the application process moves at the speed of commerce, rather than the slow pace of bureaucracy.

If the infrastructure now in place was redesigned to put business development first, there would be more money to invest and much more growth in the economy.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (1)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I certainly agree with your editorial. Economic development officers or other suc h names are the fad. We have numerous federal, provincial and municipal such employees being paid to all do the same thing. When I started my business and when I went to see them, none helped with anything. When I was on the board with one of those agencies, I could never get accurate statistics on what they actually did and what result they got. There is far too much duplication for very little results.
4
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
J. R, Moncton, NB on 04/07/09 09:57:24 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles