Telegraph-Journal apologizes to Prime Minister

Published Tuesday July 28th, 2009
A1

On Wednesday, July 8, 2009, the Telegraph-Journal published a story about the funeral mass celebrating the life of former Governor-General Romeo LeBlanc that was inaccurate and should not have been published. We pride ourselves in maintaining high standards of journalism and ethical reporting, and regret this was not followed in this case.

The story stated that a senior Roman Catholic priest in New Brunswick had demanded that the Prime Minister's Office explain what happened to the communion wafer which was handed to Prime Minister Harper during the celebration of communion at the funeral mass. The story also said that during the communion celebration, the Prime Minister "slipped the thin wafer that Catholics call 'the host' into his jacket pocket".

There was no credible support for these statements of fact at the time this article was published, nor is the Telegraph-Journal aware of any credible support for these statements now. Our reporters Rob Linke and Adam Huras, who wrote the story reporting on the funeral, did not include these statements in the version of the story that they wrote. In the editing process, these statements were added without the knowledge of the reporters and without any credible support for them.

The Telegraph-Journal sincerely apologizes to the Prime Minister for the harm that this inaccurate story has caused. We also apologize to reporters Rob Linke and Adam Huras and to our readers for our failure to meet our own standards of responsible journalism and accuracy in reporting.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (86)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

OMG. An apology to Michael Murphy for years of unsubstantiated stories cannot to be too far behind.
Reporters are not allowed to get little facts wrong, but editors are allowed to get big facts wrong.
257
Thumbs Up
39
Thumbs Down
D from Moncton, Moncton on 28/07/09 06:25:01 AM AST
A young man lost his job when he made some spelling mistakes in a story about Shawn Graham. I wonder if anyone will lose their job for basically making up a story about the Prime Minister.
447
Thumbs Up
14
Thumbs Down
John McLane, Nashwaaksis on 28/07/09 06:26:31 AM AST
My goodness...is this on the front page like it is on-line?
251
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Smalltown NB, New Brunswick on 28/07/09 06:40:54 AM AST
This is what happens when your final editing is done daily at Liberal Party headquarters.
389
Thumbs Up
95
Thumbs Down
d k., sj on 28/07/09 06:52:05 AM AST
Nelson Muntz was also reported as pointing and delivering his famous, "Ha, Ha" catch phrase.
126
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
B. O'Bama, Saint John on 28/07/09 07:49:26 AM AST
Someone slipped those comments into the story..who was it and why are they not fired?
375
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
D W, Fredericton on 28/07/09 07:58:57 AM AST
This would have to be a reporter's worst nightmare. Meanwhile, why are the reporters named but not the Editor in this case? After all, the Editor is the guilty party. Or can this also be deemed faulty?
367
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Straight Talk, Moncton on 28/07/09 08:08:24 AM AST
The apology is appropriate. If you mess up, then 'fess up. And then move on. No one in any newsroom wants mistakes in news stories. Sometimes it happens.
86
Thumbs Up
206
Thumbs Down
Tammy Wells, old Deer Islander on 28/07/09 08:09:21 AM AST
THE ADMISSION IS WELCOME, but serious questions remain. How could such an egregious act be committed? Inadvertent error is one thing; deliberate falsification quite another. Until we know if the falsification was politically motivated, caused by religious bias of some sort, or was just the brainless prank of a mischief maker, T-J readers will have no choice but to be suspicious of everything else in the paper. So let’s have some more facts, starting with a statement on how the offender was punished.
354
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Kim J., Saint John on 28/07/09 08:09:25 AM AST
Thanks for the chuckle, B. O'Bama. :)
47
Thumbs Up
15
Thumbs Down
JustRight OfCenter, Fredericton area on 28/07/09 08:59:20 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles