'It's a scandal'
Published Wednesday July 8th, 2009
Questions Catholics demand explanation for PM pocketing communion wafer at LeBlanc funeral
A senior New Brunswick Roman Catholic priest is demanding the Prime Minister's Office explain what happened to the sacramental communion wafer Stephen Harper was given at Roméo LeBlanc's funeral mass.
During communion at the solemn and dignified service held last Friday in Memramcook for the former governor general, the prime minister slipped the thin wafer that Catholics call "the host" into his jacket pocket.
In Catholic understanding, the host - once consecrated by a priest for the Eucharist - becomes the body and blood of Jesus Christ. It is crucial that the small wafer be consumed when it is received.
Monsignor Brian Henneberry, vicar general and chancellor in the Diocese of Saint John, wants to know whether the prime minister consumed the host and, if not, what happened to it.
If Harper accepted the host but did not consume it, "it's worse than a faux pas, it's a scandal from the Catholic point of view," he said.
Henneberry said a statement from the Prime Minister's Office is in order.
"If I were the prime minister, I would at least offer an explanation to say no offence was meant, and then (clarifying) what happened to the consecrated host is in order," he said. "I would hope the Prime Minister's Office would have enough respect for the Catholic Church and for faith in general to make clear whatever happened."
On Friday, during the mass, Harper reached out with his right hand and accepted the wafer from a priest.
A television camera lingered long enough to show New Brunswick Lt.-Gov. Herménégilde Chiasson, the next person to receive the host, raise his to his mouth.
But the tape shows that Harper does not consume the wafer before the camera cuts away several seconds later.
If Harper was unclear about what was appropriate during the funeral mass, said Henneberry, it "would say to me it's time to get new protocol people."
Harper and his senior spokespersons were en route to Italy on Tuesday for the G8 leaders' summit.
Harper will spend five days in Italy and on Saturday he has an audience with Pope Benedict.
Requests for comment left with Harper's media office were not immediately returned on Tuesday.
What Harper did or didn't do at the ceremony quietly raised questions at the ceremony in Memramcook Friday.
When Harper took the host, "everybody just paused and said, 'What did he do with it?'"‚" said one official who watched the pool feed with reporters who were not inside St. Thomas Church in Memramcook.
"You could see he was, 'Uh oh, I don't know what to do with this.'"‚"
The curiosity among Catholics has not gone unnoticed among Liberal insiders in Ottawa, either.
Henneberry said he has received a call on Harper's actions from a concerned Catholic, and he doubts that she is the only one puzzled and perturbed.
"She said she was very upset," he said, adding he had not seen the footage.
"She said, 'All weekend long it has been bothering me and I know I can't do something about it, but someone should.'
"She can't be the only one in this country that is thinking that."
Harper's religious affiliation raises a separate but related question about his accepting the host: As a Protestant, should he have politely declined it?
The fact it was a national event that was televised live likely complicated the situation for everyone - the priests and Harper, Henneberry said.
"If the prime minister is not a Catholic, he should not have been receiving communion and if he comes up it places the priest in an awkward position, especially at a national funeral because everyone is watching," he said.
But Rev. Arthur Bourgeois, who delivered the homily, did not have a problem with the prime minister accepting the host.
"Usually, to partake in holy communion in the Catholic Church, you have to be a member of it, but if you're not, exceptionally sometimes at major occasions (it is different)," Bourgeois said.
"If you are up there and giving holy communion you are not going to stop and asked everyone if they are Catholic or if they are not Catholic.
"You say the Lord provides."
Monsignor André Richard, who is Bishop of the Diocese of Moncton, gave Harper communion but said he didn't see what Harper did with the host.
"I didn't see anything wrong there "¦ because I was busy doing something else."
Bourgeois said it is acceptable to decline the host by simply folding one's hands, which signals the priest to bless the person.
Rev. James Weisgerber, president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and archbishop of Winnipeg, said if Harper was not given good advice before the ceremony about what to do, it is a regrettable oversight.
"I would feel very sorry for the prime minister if he wasn't informed about what the procedure is," Weisgerber said. "I would find it terrible if we put him in an embarrassing situation.
"My concern is at a funeral of that level everyone knows what the protocol is."
Harper could have simply consumed the host shortly after he was off-camera; or he could have hesitated because he expected a priest would soon invite everyone to consume the host once everyone present had received it, as occurs in some Protestant churches.
His own faith tradition certainly does things differently, says an evangelical Christian journalist who specializes in religion and politics.
Lloyd Mackey's 2005 book The Pilgrimage of Stephen Harper traces Harper's political and faith journey.
Given his church background, Harper might not have known exactly what was expected of him as a Protestant at a Roman Catholic mass, Mackey suggested.
"I don't think by himself as a Protestant adherent he'd be aware of the nuances," said Mackey, who added there would be people in his inner circle who should have advised him.
For a number of years, in Calgary and in Ottawa, Harper has worshipped at churches within the Christian and Missionary Alliance, said Mackey.
Communion in Alliance churches is typically held once a month.
It would involve the seated congregation passing along wafers and, in small individual glasses, unfermented grape juice.
Harper grew up in a background with United Church of Canada and Presbyterian influences, but he was something of a skeptic until he was a young adult.
Mackey's book says Harper's journey to a committed personal faith was influenced by fellow politician Preston Manning, among others, and came after reading much-admired Christian apologists C.S. Lewis and Malcolm Muggeridge.
LeBlanc, 81, died in late June. He had been the country's first Acadian and Maritime governor general, and before that, a senator, MP and press secretary to two prime ministers.
Disabled
Search Articles
More CE Network Sites & Partners:
Comments (95)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
Marybonita, ......... seek help, as well.
Sorry, that came out more crudely than intended. Let me re-phrase:
The comments section of a newpaper article is not a place where commenters are in any way subject to rules of formal debate, so your comment is irrelevant.
The comment did not apply to you. If, as you say, "ignoring it" is the only proper thing, why didn't you do so? Do you disagree with your own comment? Then why bother to write it?
The person to whom the comment applied is quite free to defend himself, and probably does not need your help.
People are free to say what they want here, and do not need advice on the propriety of saying it, as long as it does not violate the terms of use. No rules arbitration by other users is necessary, nor is it welcome. People who don't like it are free to write whatever they want in response as well.
In any case, I apologize Lionel. I was harsh. I will email you directly to discuss the matter further (when I want to discuss it with a person in Rome).
It always amazes me that those who in one breath speak of tolerance , in defence of "each to their own" and who resist dogma and closedmindedness can be so dogmatic, opinonated, intolerant and unwilling themselves to add to knowledge with a open mind themselves.
People who enter the realm of public debate hold their opinions out for debate, and free speech means we can debate them however we choose. People who cannot handle having their opinions discussed and considered should not enter public arenas in them.
And, "open minded" does NOT equal "willing to accept any kind of nonsense just because someone says you should". It is not "opn-minded" to accept the nonsense people spout without making them prove it, and it is not "open-minded" to never criticize the views of others, even when they are ridiculous.
Here is freedom: If you don't like to read all the comments, skip some. If you don't like them at all, don't read any. If you have something to say, say it -- but expect anyone else to say anything else back once you do. That is called freedom of speech and action.
"I was led by an Angel to the chasms of hell (...). I would have died at the very sight of these tortures if the omnipotence of God had not supported me. Let the sinner know that he will be tortured throughout all eternity, in those senses which he made use of to sin.
I am writing this at the command of God, so that no soul may find an excuse by saying there is no hell, or that nobody has ever been there, and so no one can say what it is like (...). I noticed that there are most souls that did not believe hell exists. I could hardly recover from the fright. How terribly souls suffer there!" (Diary 741).
(CONTINUED)
"In a moment I was in a misty place full of fire in which there was a great crowd of suffering souls. They were praying fervently, but to no avail for themselves; only we can come to their aid (...) their greatest torment was longing for God. I saw Our Lady visiting the souls in Purgatory. The souls call her "The Star of the Sea". She brings them refreshment" (Diary 20).
"...I was in heaven and I saw its inconceivable beauties and the happiness that awaits us after death. I saw how all creatures give ceaseless praise and glory to God. I saw how great is happiness in God, which spreads to all creatures, making them happy; and than all the glory and praise which springs from this happiness returns to its source; and they enter into the depths of God, contemplating the inner life of God (...). This source of happiness is unchanging in its essence, but it is always new, gushing forth happiness for all creatures" (Diary 777).