
'It's a scandal'
Published Wednesday July 8th, 2009

Questions Catholics demand explanation for PM pocketing communion wafer at LeBlanc funeral

A senior New Brunswick Roman Catholic priest is demanding the Prime Minister's Office explain what happened to the sacramental communion wafer Stephen Harper was given at Roméo LeBlanc's funeral mass.
During communion at the solemn and dignified service held last Friday in Memramcook for the former governor general, the prime minister slipped the thin wafer that Catholics call "the host" into his jacket pocket.
In Catholic understanding, the host - once consecrated by a priest for the Eucharist - becomes the body and blood of Jesus Christ. It is crucial that the small wafer be consumed when it is received.
Monsignor Brian Henneberry, vicar general and chancellor in the Diocese of Saint John, wants to know whether the prime minister consumed the host and, if not, what happened to it.
If Harper accepted the host but did not consume it, "it's worse than a faux pas, it's a scandal from the Catholic point of view," he said.
Henneberry said a statement from the Prime Minister's Office is in order.
"If I were the prime minister, I would at least offer an explanation to say no offence was meant, and then (clarifying) what happened to the consecrated host is in order," he said. "I would hope the Prime Minister's Office would have enough respect for the Catholic Church and for faith in general to make clear whatever happened."
On Friday, during the mass, Harper reached out with his right hand and accepted the wafer from a priest.
A television camera lingered long enough to show New Brunswick Lt.-Gov. Herménégilde Chiasson, the next person to receive the host, raise his to his mouth.
But the tape shows that Harper does not consume the wafer before the camera cuts away several seconds later.
If Harper was unclear about what was appropriate during the funeral mass, said Henneberry, it "would say to me it's time to get new protocol people."
Harper and his senior spokespersons were en route to Italy on Tuesday for the G8 leaders' summit.
Harper will spend five days in Italy and on Saturday he has an audience with Pope Benedict.
Requests for comment left with Harper's media office were not immediately returned on Tuesday.
What Harper did or didn't do at the ceremony quietly raised questions at the ceremony in Memramcook Friday.
When Harper took the host, "everybody just paused and said, 'What did he do with it?'"‚" said one official who watched the pool feed with reporters who were not inside St. Thomas Church in Memramcook.
"You could see he was, 'Uh oh, I don't know what to do with this.'"‚"
The curiosity among Catholics has not gone unnoticed among Liberal insiders in Ottawa, either.
Henneberry said he has received a call on Harper's actions from a concerned Catholic, and he doubts that she is the only one puzzled and perturbed.
"She said she was very upset," he said, adding he had not seen the footage.
"She said, 'All weekend long it has been bothering me and I know I can't do something about it, but someone should.'
"She can't be the only one in this country that is thinking that."
Harper's religious affiliation raises a separate but related question about his accepting the host: As a Protestant, should he have politely declined it?
The fact it was a national event that was televised live likely complicated the situation for everyone - the priests and Harper, Henneberry said.
"If the prime minister is not a Catholic, he should not have been receiving communion and if he comes up it places the priest in an awkward position, especially at a national funeral because everyone is watching," he said.
But Rev. Arthur Bourgeois, who delivered the homily, did not have a problem with the prime minister accepting the host.
"Usually, to partake in holy communion in the Catholic Church, you have to be a member of it, but if you're not, exceptionally sometimes at major occasions (it is different)," Bourgeois said.
"If you are up there and giving holy communion you are not going to stop and asked everyone if they are Catholic or if they are not Catholic.
"You say the Lord provides."
Monsignor André Richard, who is Bishop of the Diocese of Moncton, gave Harper communion but said he didn't see what Harper did with the host.
"I didn't see anything wrong there "¦ because I was busy doing something else."
Bourgeois said it is acceptable to decline the host by simply folding one's hands, which signals the priest to bless the person.
Rev. James Weisgerber, president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops and archbishop of Winnipeg, said if Harper was not given good advice before the ceremony about what to do, it is a regrettable oversight.
"I would feel very sorry for the prime minister if he wasn't informed about what the procedure is," Weisgerber said. "I would find it terrible if we put him in an embarrassing situation.
"My concern is at a funeral of that level everyone knows what the protocol is."
Harper could have simply consumed the host shortly after he was off-camera; or he could have hesitated because he expected a priest would soon invite everyone to consume the host once everyone present had received it, as occurs in some Protestant churches.
His own faith tradition certainly does things differently, says an evangelical Christian journalist who specializes in religion and politics.
Lloyd Mackey's 2005 book The Pilgrimage of Stephen Harper traces Harper's political and faith journey.
Given his church background, Harper might not have known exactly what was expected of him as a Protestant at a Roman Catholic mass, Mackey suggested.
"I don't think by himself as a Protestant adherent he'd be aware of the nuances," said Mackey, who added there would be people in his inner circle who should have advised him.
For a number of years, in Calgary and in Ottawa, Harper has worshipped at churches within the Christian and Missionary Alliance, said Mackey.
Communion in Alliance churches is typically held once a month.
It would involve the seated congregation passing along wafers and, in small individual glasses, unfermented grape juice.
Harper grew up in a background with United Church of Canada and Presbyterian influences, but he was something of a skeptic until he was a young adult.
Mackey's book says Harper's journey to a committed personal faith was influenced by fellow politician Preston Manning, among others, and came after reading much-admired Christian apologists C.S. Lewis and Malcolm Muggeridge.
LeBlanc, 81, died in late June. He had been the country's first Acadian and Maritime governor general, and before that, a senator, MP and press secretary to two prime ministers.


Disabled








Search Articles


Comments (95)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
I AM a Catholic and I've seen MANY non-Catholics awkwardly take Communion because they don't know what to do with it.
It is not really a big deal. Maybe you all need to say a few Hail Marys and relax!!
I Corinthians chapter 11
27 Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.
...
29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord
____________________________________________________________
For his own sake the issue should be cleared up by Stephen Harper's office.
McLaughlin, ........ I didn't say this was about "do unto ..",
(you need to go back and maybe read things a little slower)
"I" ... am trying to tell people to "Move On".
And, ..... nope, this "is not" about "politics", ... or "this paper".
It "is" about a politian who made a protocol faux paux, ... and is not hearing the end of it.
It's everyone else who is making it into something, ... it's simply not.
Once again, .... "Common Sense" is not so common.
Secondly, the various church people can't agree that there was a "faux
paux" which confirms even more that it's all politics. If the average Joe Protestant dropped in and made a 'maybe' faux paux ,it's unlikely that the Archbishop would go running to the media nor would the media bother publishing it. After all, aren't all sins equal in the eyes of god?
I think you should take your own advice and move on. I meant no offence to you and in fact agreed with what you said, just that it didn't really apply to this situation.
"Me" think more realistically?
Once again, ..... "Common Sense, ... not so common".
Moving on.
The issue here is also
1) The Archbishop committed a mortal sin.
2)Without public acknowledgement and repentance the scandal continues.
3)He needs to go for Confession.Oterwise the Mass he celebrates in future will be a scandal.
It is a mortal sin against Faith.It is against the First Commandment and the Creed.In the Creed we pray, "I believe in the Holy Spirit ,the Holy Catholic Church..."
The Creed suggests that all people need Catholic Faith and the BAptism of water for salvation and it is the Holy Spirit who guides the Holy Catholic Church to teach that all people need Catholic Faith and the Baptism of water to go to Heavena and to avoid Hell( Ad Gentes 7,Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II).
All people include Protestants like Stephen Harper.
Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II says that those who know about the Catholic Church and yet do not enter are oriented to Hell.it is a mortal sin of faith.Harper is educated,he is informed.He knows.
(continued)
He is outside the Catholic Church (Ad Gentes 7,Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II)
He is outside the Mystical Body of Jesus without Sanctifying Grace.
In this state he was not to recieve the Eucharist.If Harper dies immediately he is oriented to Hell. He committed a sacrilege.
The Archbishop knowingly cooperated in this sacrilege.
He permitted personally the sacriligious Communion.This too is a mortal sin. A grave sin. A grave sin committed with full knowledge and freely.
If one says the Archbishops action was the lesser of the two evils(whatever be the other evil),it still is evil. He is not to celebrate Holy Mass without first receiving absolution in the Confessional and makng public amends.
If one says that we cannot judge the Archbishops intentions then the Church says that the outward action indicates the interior intention(Veritatis Splendor,moral theology encyclical of Pope John Paul II).(continued)
If the Archbishop says many or most people believe (the errors) as he does it does not change the reality of sin on his soul.Jesus said the road to Hell is wide and most people take it.
If the Archbishop says these teachings were valid for the past and not anymore, then the Church says that objective reality does not change.Hell exists, mortal sin is a reality on the soul, Jesus is the same. His Death and Resurrection is still valid for today and tomorrow.
If the Archbishop says that he was following his conscience then Judas and Pilate could say the same. Also Hitler. Conscience has to be updated with the truth.And then followed. The Catholic Church is the sole moral authority, Jesus gave only this Church the KEYS and called it MY CHURCH.
Saints have seen Jesus in pain. Sr. Faustina Kowalski saw Jesus in pain when during Holy Mass a lady in mortal sin received Jesus in the Eucharist (Diary).
If the Archbishop had gone hunting and if accidently a person's hand or limb came before the gun the Archbishop would stop there-and not shoot. On July 3 the Archbishop gave Jesus pain.