
Petition would oust mayor
Published Wednesday June 24th, 2009

City Hall Realtor, property owner aiming to collect 6,300 signatures in bid to force election

SAINT JOHN - A real estate salesman and property owner has launched a petition to remove Mayor Ivan Court from office.
"He's the mayor, that's where the buck stops," Gerry Webster said. "He's had a year and he's not listened to the public."
Webster, who has already expressed his frustration with the mayor and common council, wants to present the petition to the common clerk by July 15.
The petition says, in part, "We the undersigned petition the common clerk of the City of Saint John to recall the below listed mayor" and that "an election be held as soon as possible."
The reason for the petition to recall the mayor, the document states, is "the failure to address the serious financial situation of the city and the proposed further expenditures on capital projects."
With the help of two lawyers, Webster said he has researched old city laws that allow citizens to recall politicians if they have the support of the electorate. Webster said he needs at least 15 per cent support - or about 6,300 signatures.
"I'm not expecting to have too much of a problem at all getting that," he said. "I think there's enough people mad enough to sign it, and get the mayor out and have him stand for election and stand on the merit of what he's been doing."
According to the city statute, the common clerk would ensure the signatures are valid, and set a byelection within 50 days, Webster said.
Webster has formed a committee of disgruntled citizens to help distribute the petition, and knows at least three people interested in running for mayor. Most of the problems he has with the mayor involve the issue of increasing taxes.
"They were elected on a promise they would lower taxes, but they didn't lower our costs, they've increased our costs."
With big city projects including the new $28-million police station at Peel Plaza and a multimillion-dollar new water system, Webster figures the tax rate will go up by 50 cents, or a 30 per cent increase.
"It's just not acceptable," he said, adding he has a lot of money invested in Saint John properties and can't afford an increase. "We already have the highest tax rates."
He also cited the city's new $20-million heated bus garage as an example of excessive spending.
Aside from increasing costs, Webster said he's not alone in his frustration with how the city is being run. He thinks building Peel Plaza in the uptown is foolish when the city should be attracting families to such prime real estate. He even believes Saint John has missed its chance at getting federal funding for a new water treatment system.
"I can tell you from my research, the people in Ottawa are laughing at the people of Saint John because the application they put in wouldn't be prepared this way by a Grade 10 student."
According to Webster's research, citizens used the recall law in 1919 and in 1923.
The Municipalities Act, a provincial act created in the 1970s, supersedes former city laws wherever there is a conflict between the two.
Since recall is not addressed in the act, "the previous ruling still prevails," he said.
If the mayor refuses to step down, Webster said he won't give up.
"We'll take a whole truckload of paperwork to the lieutenant-governor, and say, 'Here's the paperwork, these people want the mayor out,' " he said. "And they'd be really hard-pressed not to move the mayor out."
Once the petition is presented, Webster said Court should have the "common courtesy" to resign. If there is a byelection, Court will have the opportunity to run again, he said.
For now, it's the citizens' turn to speak, Webster said.
"Here's a chance for all the people of Saint John who are complaining about the situation to come forward and put their name on the paper and say, 'I'm not happy, I'm not taking this anymore.' "


Disabled








Search Articles


Comments (44)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
"Unwilling to address excessive spending" according to whom???? Articles like this are printed because Irven' don't like that people questioned and stood up against their tax grab for the LNG plant. Perhaps we wouldn't be in this mess if they contributed and payed what everyone else does. How are things in Bermuda anyway?
"30% rise in taxes" - according to whom???
"Application form filled out like a grade 19 student" - Well, lets see it. Lets see if for ourselves. And isn't it the mighty Rodney Weston that should be dealing with Ottawa in the first place?
This stupid petition is a slap in the face to democracy.
This paper has been on a vendetta againt Court ever since he was elected. This sends a message to politicans NOT to stand-up for citizens when things conflict with Irving's interests and that is bad for SJ.
No wonder people are putting up Greed signs everywhere.
I am sorry Mr. Webster would you want your grandchildren riding their bikes in this area of Union Street? Don't be fooled by this papaer and Mr. Webster who mereley have their own interests at stake.
Mr. Webster states, "I can tell you from my research, the people in Ottawa are laughing at the people of Saint John because the application they put in wouldn't be prepared this way by a Grade 10 student." For several years I have lived in other regions in Canada and I will tell you this – the reason why Saint John is laughed at, or viewed as “backwards” is due to the influence and control a select few have over our daily lives. It is with honest optimism that I hope TJ readers solicit other sources of news to experience the art of well written, unbiased journalism.
With regards to Mr. Webster complaining about the excessive costs of Peel Plaza and the Transit Building; I don't think the public should put much into his comments. If you recall, it was he who took the former General Hospital site (prime real estate), and placed the cheap ugly boxes that now sit on the hill and house the Federal govt and Credit Counselling Services.
Trust is earned, as far as I am concerned they can take out Higgins and Mott with the rest of the ones you listed. These two are in way over their heads and contribute nothing to council.