Bad news budget

Published Wednesday March 18th, 2009

Government Liberals highlight lower taxes but fiscal plans call for cutbacks, years of deficits

A1

FREDERICTON - The Liberal government did its best to put a gloss on a sombre provincial budget Tuesday, highlighting business and income tax cuts in a document loaded with government cutbacks and dark predictions about New Brunswick's fiscal future.

Click to Enlarge
Peter Walsh/Telegraph-Journal
Premier Shawn Graham and Finance Minister Victor Boudreau walk outside the legislature in Fredericton before the provincial budget was presented on Tuesday afternoon.

The Liberals' $7.8-billion budget includes a deficit of $741 million, largely thanks to the $300-million worth of pressure the province's ailing pension assets are putting on the books.

That deficit spending will increase the province's net debt by $968 million, pushing the total to $8.3 billion, or $11,000 per person.

In all, it's a spectacular reversal of the province's fiscal fortunes. This time last year the Grits predicted a $19-million surplus, yet they will end the current fiscal period $265 million in the red.

And the 2009-10 budget predicts it will be nearly half a decade until the province is anywhere near surplus territory again.

"The government will face significant deficits and increases in our net debt as it confronts the challenges of one of the most significant global economic and financial crises in decades," said Finance Minister Victor Boudreau while presenting his fiscal document in the legislature.

Concluded Premier Shawn Graham: "This is a budget like no other."

The Grits' budget - their third since taking office - pledges to balance the books by 2012-2013 with a razor-thin surplus of $27 million. But that figure entirely ignores continuing expenses connected to the province's sagging pension investments - $300 million a year.

That means that even in 2012-13 the province will be grappling with a $273-million shortfall. Further still, that figure assumes the economy will start to grow by a rosy five per cent annually, starting this time next year.

So in reality, the Liberals are unable to forecast a surplus any time in the near future.

"To me it is smoke and mirrors €¦ they're not being realistic. It's not accurate," said Conservative finance critic Bruce Fitch.

"Every year that pension calculation is included in your budget. Every year, whether it's a surplus or a deficit," continued the Riverview MLA.

"There's no way they can get back to balanced budgets in four years. This government is a long, long way from that."

With the prognosis bleak, the Grits announced both government cuts and tax reforms they say will help stimulate the economy.

Their four-year tax plan will deliver $143.5 million in personal and business tax savings in 2009-10, and $380.2 million in savings by 2012-2013.

Graham said the reforms represent the largest one-time tax reduction in the province's history.

He said the tax savings will attract and retain business, and leave more money in New Brunswickers' pockets to save, invest and spend.

But those tax cuts couldn't overshadow the elimination of government programs and public sector layoffs.

For example, 700 public service positions will be eliminated this year, with further cuts looming.

The Grits are also implementing a two-year wage freeze for all public employees and are placing a hold on government hiring.

As well, the budget outlined myriad program cuts, from some ferry services to plowing church parking lots in winter.

In all, the province expects cut more than $180 million in spending this year.

Tom Mann, head of the New Brunswick Union of Public and Private Employees, said all New Brunswickers should be concerned about government cuts - not just public service employees.

"For those who work (for government) there's no rest tonight. There's going to be great anxiety. This is a false-hope budget," said Mann, who represents 8,100 public workers.

"There's nothing concrete in this budget to suggest that the sacrifices being demanded of New Brunswickers today are going to work toward a solution."

For his part, Graham said his government is simply reacting to the current state of the economy.

"There are going to be New Brunswickers impacted by the difficult choices we had to make," he said.

"But the government is no different than any household in this province. New Brunswickers are today faced with difficult choices.

"And this is just the beginning of the process. I don't want to create any allusions that this a quick fix."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (6)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I'd rather keep the services they are reducing/eliminating than have a tax cut.
34
Thumbs Up
14
Thumbs Down
Uptown Girl, Saint John on 18/03/09 08:12:01 AM AST
Unfortunately, whatever the government cuts or gives people are going to complain. There are difficult pills to swallow in the budget but what could we expect? With time, things will get better, and this budget puts us on that route.
2
Thumbs Up
27
Thumbs Down
20 something woman, Fredericton on 18/03/09 11:31:24 AM AST
--the bellesile, gagetown and hampstead ferries are going to be
cut......these are ferries that were invented, designed and built
by one captain william abraham pitt....the very first in the world.
another invention by the loyalists, irish and scoth settlers of the
lower saint john ad its tributaries and saint john city.....the
'can do' enterprising spirit of these new brunswickers, a spirit that
existed only in the lower saint john and area.
some are calling it the st patricks day massacre ...and why not,
doesn't impact the acadian population!
2
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
sally mcbride, edmonton on 19/03/09 12:24:44 AM AST
looks like its time to pack up and move to a province where they value public service.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Stu Pid, saint john on 19/03/09 05:56:07 AM AST
When government cuts jobs, he saves money because Unemployment Ins. money is coming from Federal. It is ok for about 40 weeks, and after?? The right cuts should be on salaries of high position people in government. Last year the government gave up to 14% of salary increase plus 10% bonus, to deputy minister, do they need up to 184,000$ per year when a simple secretary has to pay rent and grocery with only 20,000$ per year? There is a lot of money to get back, when doing cuts at the right place. Nobody in the government talk about that solution, why they don't cut their salaries by up to 50% to show how they can keep the economy running?
When a secretary or any other regular jobs workers can keep their jobs, they have more money to expense in their community and keep more jobs running, etc... The high salaries people in government, don't expense, they save for future nice retirement. If cut salaries of 100 high salaries, they will keep their jobs and can save up to 400 regular jobs.
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Francis Berube, Kedgwick on 19/03/09 03:09:37 PM AST
Special care homes industry did not received more than an average of 8 % increase if the rate they receive for room and board AND CARE since 1997 (12 years). Owners don't count their time, it is 24 hours, 365 days (vacation inclued) and when they split their pay per hour, most of the time they receive less then 2$/hour of salary. No increase of revenu was announced for this year, the 2nd one since 2007.
Why the officials of the government don't reduce a bit their salary to give chance to one low salary employee to keep their job ? How many jobs will we save, and how many money the governement will get back with taxes from this employee with the expenses he will be able to continue to do ?? freezing a salary for 2 years is maybe to much but maybe just take one year at a time and see how the economy will go, should be better.
Has mentionned, Special Care Homes had less than 1% (0,67%) per year of revenue increase, it is time to get some increase to be at least at the todays' reality
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Francis Berube, Kedgwick on 19/03/09 03:09:57 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles