Belleisle mom stands on guard for 'O Canada'

Published Friday January 23rd, 2009
A1

SPRINGFIELD - Every time Susan Boyd hears the Canadian national anthem she thinks of her nephew, Pte. David Greenslade of Saint John, who was killed two years ago in Afghanistan.

Click to Enlarge
Kâté LEBLanc/tELEgraph-JoUrnaL
Singing the national anthem every day is important to the Boyd family, who lost a loved one, Pte. David Greenslade of Saint John, in Afghanistan. Susan Boyd and her daughter, Kara, do not agree with Belleisle Elementary School getting rid of the singing of 'O Canada' every morning.

And it devastates her that her youngest daughter doesn't start each morning at Belleisle Elementary School paying tribute to her home and native land. The school eliminated the morning ritual in September 2007 after complaints by two families who took issue with the anthem. But Boyd is speaking up to defend what is a generally accepted tradition in schools across the country.

"Respect for your country is something that should be instilled at a very young age," she said. "For years, elementary school students have stopped and stood where they were when they heard O Canada and I'm afraid that will be lost."

Erik Millett is principal of the small school of 214 students in Springfield, west of Sussex, and has heard from only a few people who oppose the decision to drop the anthem.

Boyd is convinced very few parents are aware of the cut.

It was last year, as her daughter Julia prepared to sing O Canada for Canada Day celebrations in Sussex, that she realized her youngster needed help with the lyrics.

"She said, 'I have to practise, we don't sing it at school anymore,' " Boyd said. "I was completely shocked. This is a personal thing for me and my family."

In an attempt to reinstate the anthem, Boyd has spoken with School District 6 superintendent Zoë Watson, Millett, the Home and School Association and, on Tuesday night, attended the Parent School Support Committee to voice her concern that the elimination will hurt the respect children feel for their country.

Millett said that the elimination of O Canada was not intended to "ruffle feathers" but rather accommodate all families in his school, and was one of several changes made to make for a more productive day. He said the anthem, along with morning announcements over the PA system, was distracting as students attempted to start their day by 8:35 a.m.

He consulted the teachers and decided the singing of O Canada would be reserved for monthly assemblies during which it could be sung by a large number of students and students whose parents do not want them participating could be easily be excused.

"We thought we could give more prominence, more importance, to the anthem than playing a taped version over a crackling PA system," he said. "I want to be very clear our decision to change the time, location and frequency is to provide an enhanced experience for the student."

He said that now, when O Canada is sung in the school, it is done with "meaning and purpose."

As a school administrator, he attempts to juggle the interests of a diverse population, Millett said.

"Whether it's for religious or family value reasons, this is a public education system, it's secular and we're serving the public," he said. "Is it right or is it fair for children who are not allowed to sing the anthem to be forced to?

"Different families have different beliefs. There are people of particular faiths who would say the Lord's Prayer should be brought back. Other people of particular faiths or beliefs say they don't want their child to sing the anthem. It's not up to me as a school administrator to subject kids to something their parents don't want them exposed to. I have to protect the minority rights as well as the majority rights."

"We're not living in a bubble in the Belleisle - there's cultural diversity everywhere," he said.

He feels it is important to embrace the gray areas and find a middle ground, which is exactly what he thinks he has done on this issue.

"I think diversity is wonderful. I think it should be faced and not feared, and I think we need more understanding in this world and respect for differences, not less," Millett said. "I'm not here to disrupt anyone's culture, that's not my purpose. I'm here to prepare the children to the best of my ability for the world out there, and that involves listening and understanding others."

Superintendent Watson, who has only heard from one concerned parent on the issue, said of elementary schools in the 26-school district, Belleisle is the only one not singing O Canada in the morning in either French or English, except for Macdonald Consolidated School, a kindergarten to Grade 8 school, in Kingston, where the anthem is reserved for assemblies and special events such as Remembrance Day.

Grade 9 student Kara Boyd, who prompted the media attention after writing a letter to the Telegraph-Journal this week, believes future students of her schools, like her sister Julia now in Grade 5, will be met with some confusion when they go on to high school and a new set of values where O Canada is allowed daily.

"We are Canadians and I think we should be proud of that," she said. "I think the religious issue should be taken out of it."

Millett said while parents complained about O Canada, he didn't ask specifically if their issue was with the anthem and its tribute to Canada, or if it is the inclusion of God in the words.

Watson said neither the school district, nor the province, has a policy outlining when or where the anthem should be played and said it is up to the discretion of school principals.

She said communication on these types of issues is "critical" and has asked Millett to write an article for the school's newsletter outlining to parents when and where O Canada will be sung, and invite parents to offer feedback.

"In hindsight, this should have been better communicated," the superintendent said. "I don't want to see this issue be one that is upsetting for the parent community.

"We are seeking feedback and continuing to have discussions. I'm aware of this situation now," she added.

"I have become involved and I will continue to stay involved in this discussion."

Boyd understands there is diversity in the school, but believes there also has to be consideration for the majority.

"The principal tells us he doesn't want to see children have to sit it out," Boyd said. "How about every other religion that has to sit things out like school dances, or there are books some parents don't like their children reading.

"We have Baptists and Catholics and Pentecostals and Jehovah's Witnesses and there are many different values and beliefs out there but we are all Canadians."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (50)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Here is a very interesting background on the principal involved, Erik Millet.
It's definitely worth a read: (copy and paste the link into your address bar and hit enter).


ezralevant.com/2009/01/anthembanning-principal-a-fail.html
7
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Jenn Morehouse, Moncton on 30/01/09 05:18:08 AM AST
WOW!!!!! That article is well worth the read!! You can go to Google and type in "anthem-banning principal" for this article,also. To think this so-called teacher is in charge of honing the minds of little children who may be our future politicians and community leaders is really scary!!! It sounds like he would have been a good candidate in the war years with the big "H"!
6
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
S. Bubbles, Minto on 30/01/09 07:34:45 AM AST
So the principle is a peace-loving man who isn't afraid to stand up for what he believes in. I think that it doesn't get much better than that when you are entrusting your children's education to someone.

You need to read that article with a grain of salt. As well as being poorly written, it has an extreme right wing slant on it that puts good qualities in a bad light (since when is loving peace a bad thing?)for the purpose of putting down the character of the man responsible for removing mandatory singing in the schools.

You people are so focused on how wrong this situation is that you are failing to read critically when something reinforces your opinions - you simple take it as confirming evidence regardless of the validity of the source. Please read critically when you are dealing with opinion pieces or you end up making fools of yourselves.
3
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
kyle briggs, hampton on 30/01/09 04:17:32 PM AST
Well Mr Briggs, the article does raise a question as to the validity of the request by 2 parents to remove the anthem. It hardly seems to be democratic in any way that this principal could / would unilaterally make such an important decision by himself without regard for the rest of the school, community , student body. I know none of the folks involved directly with this situation, but the bottom line for me is that this is a Public Cdn school, paid for by Cdn taxpayers and should be governed accordingly, by majority. I didn't read one comment where anyone suggested the 2 or 3 individual students should be "forced" to participate.I too, am suspect as to how disruptive the 2 or 3 minutes could be to the teachers' day. Can they not be better prepared ? Are their schedules that inflexible ? Come on now, that seems pretty lame.. Put the anthem back !! Far less disruptive to have 2 sets of parents ( supposedly ) out of sorts than to have an entire community at odds !!
6
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Bob Biggar, Fredercton on 30/01/09 04:35:36 PM AST
Mr. Briggs, I do not know you and you do not know me. I am a mom of one of the students of Belleisle Elementary School. I think you need to back off. I am the PSSC chair of BES. We never asked or demanded the children to sing. the families never asked for these changes. these changes were made by erik. I feel my Daughter has the right to love her school and country and not have simple people like you dictating your beliefs. We are a nation and are very proud. If you do not want to be apart of our home...then go back where you have come from. We believe in our nation....Do you? When you sleep at night I hope your dreams are full of loyality to your home land CANADA. If you have nothing to contribute to your country then your in the wrong country!!!! My Daughter has rights too!
9
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
C. johnston, Belleisle on 30/01/09 08:01:57 PM AST
You're right, I am being a bit harsh, mainly because I am getting sick of the "sing the anthem or get out of Canada" mentality of half of the posters here. I appologize. I fully agree that banning or making singing mandatory are both equally wrong, as I said earlier, and banning it for the sake of two parents isn't a very strong stance. Agreed. Giving the choice is the solution that is most in line with Canadian values.

However, I do take offense at the "go back where you came from" line. I was born in Toronto, and lived in NB for 10 years, and now reside in Ottawa. I simply find the idea of singing an anthem in school every day pointless. It never did anything to make me more proud of my country during the 5 or so years I was forced to do it. Whether or not I, or anyone, chooses to sing a song has nothing to do with what we have to contribute to our country - in fact, if singing is all someone has to contribute, they aren't adding much.
2
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
kyle briggs, hampton on 31/01/09 11:50:02 AM AST
Unbelievable, this is why people want to come to this country because of our history and traditions. We can't change to suit everyone that doesn't accept the ideals of this country! "Keep changing to accommodate your environment and you will be nothing." The country has to stand on it's history and ideals. What is in the national anthem that's so bad, and in some way offends someones religion and culture?
I think that the truth behind this story lies with the pacifist beliefs of the Principal and Green Party candidate, Mr. Millet! Granted, O Canada is laden with "SUPPOSEDLY" militaristic words and messages that clearly support defending our land and way of life but that was how are nation was formed and kept FREE, like it or not!
5
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
S. Bubbles, Minto on 31/01/09 11:55:57 AM AST
He (Millett) and his fellow pacifists are free to express their opinion BUT IN NO WAY should they be allowed to deny the beliefs of the MAJORITY for the sake of its' MINORITY concerns!
6
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Sonny Bubbles, Minto on 31/01/09 11:57:45 AM AST
From the website---" greenparty.ca/en/campaign/13004 " --Mr. Millett can be reached at---(506) 832-2465 (h) or by e-mail at millett@canoemail.com
Any concerns could be addressed to him through either of these ways.
1
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
S. Bubbles, Minto on 31/01/09 12:49:52 PM AST
I do think this issue has been settled properly, but I feel I must add that this woman whom felt compelled to bring the issue to the media and do her best to overturn the principals decision lost my respect in the end. Her fight was a worthy one, but her comments after were not. The principal had a difficult decision to make, one which he tried to fashion in such a way as to fill the needs for both sides of the issue. Yes it would appear he leaned to far in trying to accomodate the few, and misread the needs and feelings of the many. However, give him the credit he deserves for trying. Don't ridicule his "reasoning" and speak of how you have lost respect for the man as if he is beneath you. This is a man who I will say I respect for his effort in trying to find a compromise. I don't agree with his reasoning, nor did I agree with his solution, but I most certainly respect his opinion, his efforts, and his unwavering defense of what he thought was right. Even wrong, he deserves respect.
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
J Smith, London on 05/02/09 08:35:56 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles