Belleisle mom stands on guard for 'O Canada'

Published Friday January 23rd, 2009
A1

SPRINGFIELD - Every time Susan Boyd hears the Canadian national anthem she thinks of her nephew, Pte. David Greenslade of Saint John, who was killed two years ago in Afghanistan.

Click to Enlarge
Kâté LEBLanc/tELEgraph-JoUrnaL
Singing the national anthem every day is important to the Boyd family, who lost a loved one, Pte. David Greenslade of Saint John, in Afghanistan. Susan Boyd and her daughter, Kara, do not agree with Belleisle Elementary School getting rid of the singing of 'O Canada' every morning.

And it devastates her that her youngest daughter doesn't start each morning at Belleisle Elementary School paying tribute to her home and native land. The school eliminated the morning ritual in September 2007 after complaints by two families who took issue with the anthem. But Boyd is speaking up to defend what is a generally accepted tradition in schools across the country.

"Respect for your country is something that should be instilled at a very young age," she said. "For years, elementary school students have stopped and stood where they were when they heard O Canada and I'm afraid that will be lost."

Erik Millett is principal of the small school of 214 students in Springfield, west of Sussex, and has heard from only a few people who oppose the decision to drop the anthem.

Boyd is convinced very few parents are aware of the cut.

It was last year, as her daughter Julia prepared to sing O Canada for Canada Day celebrations in Sussex, that she realized her youngster needed help with the lyrics.

"She said, 'I have to practise, we don't sing it at school anymore,' " Boyd said. "I was completely shocked. This is a personal thing for me and my family."

In an attempt to reinstate the anthem, Boyd has spoken with School District 6 superintendent Zoë Watson, Millett, the Home and School Association and, on Tuesday night, attended the Parent School Support Committee to voice her concern that the elimination will hurt the respect children feel for their country.

Millett said that the elimination of O Canada was not intended to "ruffle feathers" but rather accommodate all families in his school, and was one of several changes made to make for a more productive day. He said the anthem, along with morning announcements over the PA system, was distracting as students attempted to start their day by 8:35 a.m.

He consulted the teachers and decided the singing of O Canada would be reserved for monthly assemblies during which it could be sung by a large number of students and students whose parents do not want them participating could be easily be excused.

"We thought we could give more prominence, more importance, to the anthem than playing a taped version over a crackling PA system," he said. "I want to be very clear our decision to change the time, location and frequency is to provide an enhanced experience for the student."

He said that now, when O Canada is sung in the school, it is done with "meaning and purpose."

As a school administrator, he attempts to juggle the interests of a diverse population, Millett said.

"Whether it's for religious or family value reasons, this is a public education system, it's secular and we're serving the public," he said. "Is it right or is it fair for children who are not allowed to sing the anthem to be forced to?

"Different families have different beliefs. There are people of particular faiths who would say the Lord's Prayer should be brought back. Other people of particular faiths or beliefs say they don't want their child to sing the anthem. It's not up to me as a school administrator to subject kids to something their parents don't want them exposed to. I have to protect the minority rights as well as the majority rights."

"We're not living in a bubble in the Belleisle - there's cultural diversity everywhere," he said.

He feels it is important to embrace the gray areas and find a middle ground, which is exactly what he thinks he has done on this issue.

"I think diversity is wonderful. I think it should be faced and not feared, and I think we need more understanding in this world and respect for differences, not less," Millett said. "I'm not here to disrupt anyone's culture, that's not my purpose. I'm here to prepare the children to the best of my ability for the world out there, and that involves listening and understanding others."

Superintendent Watson, who has only heard from one concerned parent on the issue, said of elementary schools in the 26-school district, Belleisle is the only one not singing O Canada in the morning in either French or English, except for Macdonald Consolidated School, a kindergarten to Grade 8 school, in Kingston, where the anthem is reserved for assemblies and special events such as Remembrance Day.

Grade 9 student Kara Boyd, who prompted the media attention after writing a letter to the Telegraph-Journal this week, believes future students of her schools, like her sister Julia now in Grade 5, will be met with some confusion when they go on to high school and a new set of values where O Canada is allowed daily.

"We are Canadians and I think we should be proud of that," she said. "I think the religious issue should be taken out of it."

Millett said while parents complained about O Canada, he didn't ask specifically if their issue was with the anthem and its tribute to Canada, or if it is the inclusion of God in the words.

Watson said neither the school district, nor the province, has a policy outlining when or where the anthem should be played and said it is up to the discretion of school principals.

She said communication on these types of issues is "critical" and has asked Millett to write an article for the school's newsletter outlining to parents when and where O Canada will be sung, and invite parents to offer feedback.

"In hindsight, this should have been better communicated," the superintendent said. "I don't want to see this issue be one that is upsetting for the parent community.

"We are seeking feedback and continuing to have discussions. I'm aware of this situation now," she added.

"I have become involved and I will continue to stay involved in this discussion."

Boyd understands there is diversity in the school, but believes there also has to be consideration for the majority.

"The principal tells us he doesn't want to see children have to sit it out," Boyd said. "How about every other religion that has to sit things out like school dances, or there are books some parents don't like their children reading.

"We have Baptists and Catholics and Pentecostals and Jehovah's Witnesses and there are many different values and beliefs out there but we are all Canadians."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (50)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Nobody is asking you to deny your rights or heritage, they are asking you not to force your personal way of expressing them on the rest of us. I am not anti-Canadian, and I am offended by the suggestion. I am simply for freedom of expresson in all forms, including the right not to express if that is how you choose to do it.

Consider. How is forcing someone to sing the anthem in schools any less of a violation of rights than disallowing it altogether? Both are equally wrong. Instead, the choice should be offered. That is what freedom is all about. Choice.
3
Thumbs Up
29
Thumbs Down
kyle briggs, hampton on 27/01/09 11:40:38 PM AST
it should not be a choice briggs it should be mandatory anyone refusing our anthems or anyone doing anything to our flag should be trial for treason to our country it as simple as that
it is our country and it is time we as CANADIANS stand up for it
20
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
pierre p, moncton on 28/01/09 08:57:06 AM AST
I'm done arguing. That fact that the bigotry in that statement actually go two whole thumbs up depresses me beyond words.

I suspect that if you do some research you will find that the only country in which singing the anthem is mandatory with a treason charge is Oceania from George Orwell's 1984, which you should consider reading if you haven't already.
3
Thumbs Up
25
Thumbs Down
kyle briggs, hampton on 28/01/09 01:56:57 PM AST
it no bigotry it my country and i luv it ..

so what is wrong in demanding respect for our flag and our anthems ???


stop being politically correct and live real life
20
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
pierre p, moncton on 28/01/09 02:31:26 PM AST
The principal says he is protecting the rights of the majority as well as the minority...this is so not true. He is bowing down to the minority. The families who's religion prevents them from practising patriotism.....they still send their kids to a public school where the public purse pays for their education, if patriotism is against their religion shouldn't TAKING from a country be against it too?? It just doesn't make sense to me. I will say though that the issue is not Millett's policitcal leanings and Mr. Thompson was wrong to bring that into the debate. It muddies the water. The anthem should be sung and if TWO families' kids can't sing, they can refrain from doing so. I would presume if it is a religious matter the children would be well versed on why they can't sing the anthem, so they should have no trouble defending themselves when questions are asked.
22
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Anonymous Reader, Saint John on 28/01/09 02:55:12 PM AST
Good Day. I am the the chairperson of our parent support committee. I worked along side of Mr. Millet for almost 3 years now. I want everyone to know that he is what this school needs. The children love him, respect him and look up to him. What I do think needs to happen is better communication. I did not know of this situation until Nov.2008. I did not recieve this information from the principal but from parents of the school. I feel that it takes math, french, english, art, gym, music, science, library, and other class provided including history. Canada is our history, our home, our nation. This is not a matter of religion, it supporting our country. My daughter should not have to choose between her school and her country. I really feel this decision needs to be reverse. This is not from a committee's point of view, but from a parents point of view. We are CANADIANS, so why is this such a debate. Who cares what religion you are? Why not live happy together. I AM CANADIAN, ARE YOU????
20
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
C. johnston, Belleisle on 28/01/09 04:14:53 PM AST
When is "majority Rule" going to be the norm
I am tired of the minority changing the Canadian landscape.
Belleisle, take up the charge and fight this!!!
Please!!
23
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
wally f, s on 28/01/09 06:53:38 PM AST
This is one of the few times that I am disappointed to be Canadian. It seems that we have swung too far towards accommodating personal freedoms to the detriment of Canada as a whole. As a naturalized immigrant I have fully bought into the goodness, and badness, of all things Canadian - and the good far outweighs the bad. As a sailor in the Canadian Navy, I fear that the many sacrifices made may have been in vain if such a basic symbol as "O Canada" is shelved for the good of the few.
I have no deep philosophical reason for this feeling, just a very biased sentiment towards what I feel that our anthem stands for.
Excuse me...I'm just going to step outside and catch a patriotic fix...shield your ears, some listeners may find the sound quality and content offensive...
18
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
A. Lopez, Ottawa on 29/01/09 12:17:43 AM AST
This is not a matter of religion, nor is it a matter of diversity.

O Canada is the national anthem of the country and is entirely appropriate to be sung. If an individual feels uncomfortable about that, then the appropriate response it to stand respectfully and quietly while others do.

These days I live in the United States, where the Pledge of Allegiance is said at the beginning of many functions. As a Canadian citizen (forever!), I decline to recite it, but I stand in respect for those who do.

20
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
T. Wells, old Deer Islander on 29/01/09 11:29:33 AM AST
Here's some comments from across canada
http://forum.canadianparents.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=887230#Post887230
2
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
S. Ingalls, Saint John on 29/01/09 12:12:10 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles