Carsick family battles dealer

Published Tuesday November 11th, 2008
A1

SUSSEX - Most people love that new car smell, but a Sussex family says the rancid odour that filled their noses every time they buckled themselves into their new Kia made them dreadfully ill.

Click to Enlarge
Tammy Scott-Wallace/Telegraph-Journal
The Gray family of Sussex suffered respiratory illnesses for two years after they bought a 2006 Kia Spectra in Saint John.

For two years Crystal McLaughlin-Gray, her husband Pat Gray and their two children battled runny noses and shortness of breath. Their symptoms would settle, then spike, forcing them into their doctor's office to renew prescription after prescription for ailments such as lung infections and pneumonia.

"Off and on the past two years you would think we were all dying. We were running to doctors constantly," McLaughlin-Gray said.

Doctors' reports prove the family members have been sick. An independent lab study points directly to the family's 2006 Kia Spectra.

The car is now sitting in the family's driveway, unuseable in the Grays' opinion and continuing to rot on the inside. They are still making monthly payments, even though the couple insists they will never drive the car again.

Meanwhile, the dealership that sold them the car, Saint John Kia Motors, has declined to replace it.

McLaughlin-Gray says her children's health has been improving since they have not been driving in the car. A pulmonary function test done on her husband, Pat, on Oct. 22 shows the health of his lungs is still be that of a 70 year old.

He is 35, a non-smoker, and has always been athletic. He was also the main driver of the car.

He said over time he could see a pattern of difficulty breathing after prolonged exposure.

"You never dream that your car, especially a new one, is making you sick," the mild-mannered heavy equipment operator said. "I'm wondering if anyone from Saint John Kia or Kia Canada would want their wife and children in that car, because I certainly don't."

A respiratory therapist and ear/nose/throat specialist have each been involved in the family's care. While the respiratory therapist is not pointing to any specific cause, the specialist said the family was being poisoned, McLaughlin-Gray said.

Last summer, when the tether that holds five-year-old Marcus's booster seat snapped, his parents started to dig deeper and found the car was rotting from the inside out.

While the white interior of the car looked as it should, an independent lab hired by the Grays showed three types of mould eating away the trunk floor and beneath the back seats. The Fredericton-based RPC labs, in its report of Sept. 23, revealed prolonged water intrusion in the vehicle had caused moulds including penicillium, mucor and trichoderma to grow. In the microbial results' explanation, it outlined the moulds could cause the symptoms the family was experiencing and recommended the carpeting and seats be removed "as soon as possible."

The family had the car towed to a Sussex dealership that found a defect with the car's manufacturing. The striker plate located around the trunk's lock is deficient and causes water to leak into the trunk and seep under the car seats.

While the car is still covered by warranty and the family continues to make its monthly payments, it sits locked in their Sussex driveway.

McLaughlin-Gray has no intentions of her family ever stepping foot in it again. Meanwhile, she bought a second-hand car to get around.

"People should not be in that vehicle," the school guidance counseller said.

In February 2006, the Grays bought their red Spectra from Saint John Kia but because of the distance had the car serviced in Sussex as required to uphold its warranty.

They have the receipts to prove the work was done.

By May of that year, the smell inside was nauseating, McLaughlin-Gray said. She first contacted Kia and was told Scotchgarding likely caused the odour.

Not long afterward she took the new car to be professionally cleaned inside and, still, the smell wouldn't go away.

The family suffered from 2006 until they made their disturbing discoveries this summer.

In an email sent to McLaughlin-Gray on Sept. 10 by Corey MacDonald, district parts and service manager for Kia Canada Inc., MacDonald made what he called a "goodwill offering" for their troubles.

"Even though you have chosen to have your vehicle serviced elsewhere, and you have not returned to Saint John Kia since purchasing the vehicle in 2006, Saint John Kia is prepared to offer dealer cost on all parts involved in the repair. This is a savings of approximately $859, plus taxes to you," he wrote.

Items listed included seat belts, buckles, a tube of seam sealer, carpeting, detailing and cleaning.

"As well, as a gesture of goodwill Kia Canada is prepared to cover 50 per cent of the cost of the repair, and detailing; plus cover the cost of the rental vehicle during the diagnosis phase of this case."

As outlined in the email, the Gray's share of the replacement parts and labour was more than $1,600 plus tax.

"Upon accepting this gesture Kia Canada would require that you sign a release form removing any liability from Kia Canada or its subsidiaries," MacDonald's email read.

McLaughlin-Gray said once the family declined the offer, MacDonald told them to remove the vehicle from Kia's Rothesay Avenue property, which they finally did last week - mould and mildew intact.

The mom wanted the car to be replaced with another 2006 Spectra, insisting she was uncomfortable with her family re-entering the car that made them so sick.

The family's insurance provider won't cover the costs of repair because the damage is not the direct cause of an "insured peril".

Two weeks ago the Grays filed legal action against Saint John Kia and Kia Canada.

"We're still paying for a car that's just sitting there," McLaughlin-Gray said. "This has been a nightmare.

"I have two children involved here. I need to protect them."

While MacDonald and Saint John Kia manager Tom Cahill did not respond to requests for an interview, in an emailed statement to the Telegraph-Journal, Kia Canada's public relations manager Sixto Fernandez said the company is taking the Gray's complaint seriously.

"Kia Canada prides itself on the quality of its vehicles and takes any dissatisfaction with its products and every customer grievance very seriously," he wrote from his office in Ontario.

"In the instant case, I can advise that we are thoroughly investigating the matter so that we may properly assess the complaint."

Until such time as we have completed our investigation, Kia Canada declines to comment further on the cause of the mould allegedly found in the vehicle or on what may be an appropriate resolution of the matter."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (35)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

yes i think saint john kia should be sued,they should be giving them a brand new car that is not defective plus pay for all medicine grays had to pay for,plus any medical problem they may have in years to come,,good luck,,hope you win your case

20
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
crk371 bri, saint john,new brunswick on 13/11/08 08:47:33 AM AST
Thanks for this article. Sounds like a terrible car. I'll make sure never to buy one. Good luck in your lawsuit.
13
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Animal Chin, Saint John on 13/11/08 11:43:34 AM AST
It's interesting how some businesses don't understand the basics of marketing. If a customer likes your product/service, they will probably tell a few friends. If a customer dislikes your product/service they will probably tell a dozen friends.

Bad publicity like this will ultimately cost the Kia dealership more than the price of a new car.

Regards
13
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Freddy Rose, Saint John on 13/11/08 12:59:18 PM AST
This comment has been removed due to a violation of canadaeast.com's Terms of Use, Section F. Interactive Features. Click here to review the Terms of Use.
John Blutarsky, Moncton on 13/11/08 02:14:02 PM AST
Where are the other owners of this type of car, are they experiencing similar problems? Consumer Reports?
9
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
John Blutarsky, Moncton on 13/11/08 02:15:56 PM AST
Yeah it sounds like a good scam to run, make you and your kids sick so you can a new 2006 KIA (AS if). Everyone should get on this. SO are the lab reports and the doctors opinion all part of the grand scam to get a 2006 car? SOme people have no common sense or they obviously have connections with KIA, or else they would not makes comments like that.
12
Thumbs Up
14
Thumbs Down
shawn verner, quispamsis on 13/11/08 03:00:24 PM AST
Lorraine Saulnier: No, they don't deserve a new car. They deserve a 2006 vehicle to replace it.
7
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Anonymous Anonymous, Fredericton on 13/11/08 04:54:50 PM AST
All the above post prove one thing to me. If you are in business, you better look after complaints. Word of mouth can build a business or destroy it. I took over a business with a bad reputation, looked after all complaints promptly and built a great business. Some complaints you have to take a loss on but if the product is good, you should get few complaints and be able to solve them.
11
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
J. R, Moncton, NB on 13/11/08 04:59:46 PM AST
That is my point, they should get a 2006 KIA Spectra, which is what they paid for. Not a Brand new one. In the article I beleive that is what the family wants,what they should get and what they deserve. Period. What a bad move for this KIA dealership or head office KIA people to do this.
5
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
shawn verner, quispamsis on 13/11/08 07:35:15 PM AST
J.R - no kidding and for some reason customer support teams are usually not well paid or kids/part timers or run from India.
7
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Raoul Duke, Amsterdam on 14/11/08 05:33:33 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles