
A drastic overhaul


Education Expert says province's plan to scrap early French immersion doesn't go far enough
SAINT JOHN - The province's decision to scrap early immersion and institute a universal French program beginning in Grade 5 is a step in the right direction, says education expert Doug Willms - but he would go even further.
A key benefit of Education Minister Kelly Lamrock's plan is that it eliminates student streaming at an early age, said Willms, director of the Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy.
In a document released by the institute today, Willms lays out the case for universal French instruction, arguing it will substantially boost student performance by ending the practice of concentrating lower-ability children in core French classrooms.
The Telegraph-Journal obtained a copy of the document during an editorial board meeting with Willms last week.
But while the Lamrock plan will substantially chip away at the streaming problem, Willms says a more drastic overhaul would yield even better results.
"My vision would be a completely unstreamed system all the way until high school," he said.
Under Lamrock's plan, students in Grade 6 can choose to enter late immersion or post-intensive French.
Willms would remove that option and institute a universal program all the way through, until at least Grade 9, to ensure minimal segregation of students.
He'd also start the program in Grade 4 instead of 5 and incorporate elements of French instruction in kindergarten and Grades 1-3, acknowledging that as with all subjects, the earlier a student begins learning, the better.
Measuring and assessing results is also crucial to the success of any program, he added, but noted results of Lamrock's reforms won't be measurable for at least a decade.
At this point, he said, it's tough to judge the impact the new program will have on achievement rates.
"Is it the right plan?
"I don't know," Willms said.
"Certainly the plan we've got now isn't working."
Taken alone, he added, the elimination of early immersion will not solve the problem of New Brunswick's high illiteracy rates and poor performance on international testing.
The results from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) testing - which measures reading literacy, math and science skills - have been consistently poor in the province.
In 2000, New Brunswick came dead last among all Canadian provinces.
In 2003, the province moved into ninth place, and in the last round of testing in 2006, New Brunswick was also at the rear of the pack.
In addition to the changes in French second language education, the province must renew its focus on quality teaching, adequate learning time and student engagement, Willms said.
"It's really fundamental in this system that the resources are in place so that we reduce the number of children who end up being struggling readers," he said. "The move to universal immersion has to go hand-in-hand with more resources in Grades kindergarten through 3."
Willms also recommended shuffling up programming in June, a time when teachers and students are tired and eager for the summer holidays.
Changes should be made to ensure schools make the most of that month, he said.
For example, students with a keen interest in science could take on a challenging new project, while students struggling with reading could use the time for a remedial literacy course.








More Actualités




Search Articles





Comments (24)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
Intensive French should start earlier than Grade 5?
That French should still be taught Grades 1-3/4?
And that ALL kids should be kept in a French Intensive/French Immersion until Grade 9? Not sure I have this one right..
That cutting EFI isn't going to improve NB's PISA scores.
Oh and more resources should be put into Grade 1-3.
Except that he eliminates EFI at Grade 1 he sounds more like protestors than he does like Mr. Lamrock.
The Lamrock Plan is based completely on the Croll-Lee Report, a report that is demonstrably flawed. Even the Government acknowledges this. We need to find a plan that addresses streaming AND provides choice for parents. The Lamrock Plan does neither.
It is high time for the Graham Government to SLOW DOWN and consult.
The consequences of this decision are far too great to base them on hopes and wishes of Kelly Lamrock.
Enough.
I still can't figure out why this guy says one thing, every other expert says the opposite, and Lamrock still listens to him. Hold on folks - wait for Lamrock's next big announcement - and see who is really setting education policy in NB.
I care. What I care about is that my children get the best possible education our Province and afford to give them. An education that will provide them with a foundation to build their future success on. When expert after expert line up and say we're doing the wrong thing I have no choice to listen. That's what this debate is about.
Any attempt to redirect the debate to a competition over language simply clouds the issue. I care, but I don't feel threatened by the fact that I share the province with another culture. I prefer to embrace the fact that the make up of our province gives our children a unique opportunity to learn skills that I can't teach them.