A drastic overhaul

Published Monday April 28th, 2008

Education Expert says province's plan to scrap early French immersion doesn't go far enough

A1

SAINT JOHN - The province's decision to scrap early immersion and institute a universal French program beginning in Grade 5 is a step in the right direction, says education expert Doug Willms - but he would go even further.

Caption
Doug Wilms, director of the Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy, says universal French instruction would substantially boost student performance.

A key benefit of Education Minister Kelly Lamrock's plan is that it eliminates student streaming at an early age, said Willms, director of the Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy.

In a document released by the institute today, Willms lays out the case for universal French instruction, arguing it will substantially boost student performance by ending the practice of concentrating lower-ability children in core French classrooms.

The Telegraph-Journal obtained a copy of the document during an editorial board meeting with Willms last week.

But while the Lamrock plan will substantially chip away at the streaming problem, Willms says a more drastic overhaul would yield even better results.

"My vision would be a completely unstreamed system all the way until high school," he said.

Under Lamrock's plan, students in Grade 6 can choose to enter late immersion or post-intensive French.

Willms would remove that option and institute a universal program all the way through, until at least Grade 9, to ensure minimal segregation of students.

He'd also start the program in Grade 4 instead of 5 and incorporate elements of French instruction in kindergarten and Grades 1-3, acknowledging that as with all subjects, the earlier a student begins learning, the better.

Measuring and assessing results is also crucial to the success of any program, he added, but noted results of Lamrock's reforms won't be measurable for at least a decade.

At this point, he said, it's tough to judge the impact the new program will have on achievement rates.

"Is it the right plan?

"I don't know," Willms said.

"Certainly the plan we've got now isn't working."

Taken alone, he added, the elimination of early immersion will not solve the problem of New Brunswick's high illiteracy rates and poor performance on international testing.

The results from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) testing - which measures reading literacy, math and science skills - have been consistently poor in the province.

In 2000, New Brunswick came dead last among all Canadian provinces.

In 2003, the province moved into ninth place, and in the last round of testing in 2006, New Brunswick was also at the rear of the pack.

In addition to the changes in French second language education, the province must renew its focus on quality teaching, adequate learning time and student engagement, Willms said.

"It's really fundamental in this system that the resources are in place so that we reduce the number of children who end up being struggling readers," he said. "The move to universal immersion has to go hand-in-hand with more resources in Grades kindergarten through 3."

Willms also recommended shuffling up programming in June, a time when teachers and students are tired and eager for the summer holidays.

Changes should be made to ensure schools make the most of that month, he said.

For example, students with a keen interest in science could take on a challenging new project, while students struggling with reading could use the time for a remedial literacy course.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (24)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

So this fellow who wrote the report that the new system is based on thinks.

Intensive French should start earlier than Grade 5?

That French should still be taught Grades 1-3/4?

And that ALL kids should be kept in a French Intensive/French Immersion until Grade 9? Not sure I have this one right..

That cutting EFI isn't going to improve NB's PISA scores.

Oh and more resources should be put into Grade 1-3.


Except that he eliminates EFI at Grade 1 he sounds more like protestors than he does like Mr. Lamrock.
68
Thumbs Up
21
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 6:28:43 AM ADT
So in essence, Doug Willms is no longer supporting the Lamrock plan. An interesting development indeed.
62
Thumbs Up
23
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 7:23:32 AM ADT
Eventually there will be no English program at all. Does anyone care?
7
Thumbs Up
54
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 7:43:56 AM ADT
Looks like it just got a little lonelier on Mr. Lamrock's Island. Is there anyone left with a visitors pass?



57
Thumbs Up
20
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 8:06:27 AM ADT
No expert fully supports the Lamrock Plan, a fact which this newspaper ignores by supporting the Government. We need to follow the Ombudsman's recommendation of a year moratorium, allowing for full public debate and expert consultation.

The Lamrock Plan is based completely on the Croll-Lee Report, a report that is demonstrably flawed. Even the Government acknowledges this. We need to find a plan that addresses streaming AND provides choice for parents. The Lamrock Plan does neither.
71
Thumbs Up
20
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Robert Hoadley, Fredericton on 28/04/08, 8:08:04 AM ADT
If even Doug Willms is questioning this plan, the one expert the Government is holding up as on their side, well, then, we have a major problem on our hands.

It is high time for the Graham Government to SLOW DOWN and consult.

The consequences of this decision are far too great to base them on hopes and wishes of Kelly Lamrock.

Enough.
73
Thumbs Up
19
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 8:17:42 AM ADT
Lamrock's plan develops as he goes. Even his buddy doesn't agree with it. Anyone surprised?
62
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
just-a-parent a., Saint John on 28/04/08, 8:18:22 AM ADT
We do not segregate students in this country. Segregation implies forced separation. Students have (well, had...) options here. The continued reference to segregation by Dr. Willms is offensive and wrong.
60
Thumbs Up
19
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 8:24:10 AM ADT
So is Willms saying everyone should get immersion, or nobody should get immersion? Based on his position so far in this debate, and the fact that the government and NBTA would never go for universal immersion, I'm betting on no immersion. There's a thought - now everyone will be mediocre at best in French.

I still can't figure out why this guy says one thing, every other expert says the opposite, and Lamrock still listens to him. Hold on folks - wait for Lamrock's next big announcement - and see who is really setting education policy in NB.
47
Thumbs Up
19
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 8:35:00 AM ADT
7:43,

I care. What I care about is that my children get the best possible education our Province and afford to give them. An education that will provide them with a foundation to build their future success on. When expert after expert line up and say we're doing the wrong thing I have no choice to listen. That's what this debate is about.

Any attempt to redirect the debate to a competition over language simply clouds the issue. I care, but I don't feel threatened by the fact that I share the province with another culture. I prefer to embrace the fact that the make up of our province gives our children a unique opportunity to learn skills that I can't teach them.

61
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 28/04/08, 8:36:10 AM ADT
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles