In the courts

Published Friday October 30th, 2009
C2

SAINT JOHN - Caught in sting, jailed for year

Another young man swept up in the six-month-long Operation Portland undercover drug sting will be doing time behind bars. Provincial court Judge Anne Jeffries sentenced Jeremy Ingersoll, 20, of King Street West to one year in jail Thursday after the accused entered a guilty plea to a charge of trafficking in cocaine on Sept. 3. She also ordered him to provide a DNA sample and prohibited him from owning or possessing firearms for a period of 10 years. Fourteen people had already received penitentiary-length terms for charges resulting from Operation Portland and one got 10 months. Defence counsel Rod Macdonald made a strong plea for a shorter sentence than most, saying Ingersoll had already quit dealing drugs before his arrest because he was "repulsed" at what they did. He was accused of selling $20 worth of cocaine to an undercover officer. After saying he was sorry for what he did, the judge asked, "Sorry enough not to do it again?" He assured her he was, adding, "You will never see me again."

Transferred power meter

SAINT JOHN - Jeremy Russell Bennett, 27, told provincial court Judge Alfred Brien he knows what he did was wrong, but he wasn't thinking that way when he took a power meter belonging to Saint John Energy off an empty building on St. James Street last July and installed it at 231 St. James St., where he lived. He said all he wanted at the time was for his family to be able to enjoy the luxuries of hot water, like baths, after having lived off a power generator and barbecue all summer because their electricity had been cut off. He said he only used the power source for two or three days before moving. The judge fined him $1,000 and ordered him to pay a victim fine surcharge. Bennett was given until Feb. 1 to pay his fines.

 

Comments (16)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

"Transferred power meter" - We need some kind of safety net where people can at least be allowed to have the essential service of power. People obviously should have to pay for power if they can, but it shouldn't be disconnected if the customer falls behind. Arrangements should be made rather then forcing the customer to fend for himself/herself.

If you think of it as "standard of living" then what would be the difference between someone living in a developing country that does not have power or hot water and someone living in Canada that instead had the service disconnected?

As for what this person did, yes it's illegal but he/she was indeed doing what "he had to do". I question the whole victim surcharge thing in this case as well. Wouldn't he be the victim for not having the minimum quality of living in this country? Just my 2 cents.
35
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Richard Seguin, Saint John on 30/10/09 10:14:33 AM AST
Obviously if he has the skills to transfer a power meter without electrocuting himself then he has the skills to get a job and pay his electricity bills like the rest of us!
24
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
D Murray, Rothesay on 30/10/09 12:06:42 PM AST
To comment #2... I was commenting on principal. People shouldn't have to make "a decision" between breaking the law or having a fundamental service. Plus, how exactly is this man suppose to find gainful employment with a criminal record now? (assuming this was his first offence).
18
Thumbs Up
11
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Richard Seguin, Saint John on 30/10/09 12:11:29 PM AST
Richard Seguin he should have thought of that BEFORE breaking the law. Being lazy and not getting a job is no excuse to steal. We all make our own decisions. There are lots of jobs out there and some pay more than others, but the bottom line is, get a job and pay your bills.
19
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
D Murray, Rothesay on 30/10/09 12:24:52 PM AST
D Murray, I do agree that he made the wrong choice when deciding to move the meter. I even agree with the comment that since he had the intellect to move it he probably could have done something to fix his problem legally (like finding a job or moving somewhere that had hydro included). The persons action in this case is obviously very dangerous (as you said he could have been electrocuted).

If you subtract the persons action and speak on more of a broad sense I am sure you will agree that hydro isn't exactly a luxury. My point was that on a general sense there should be something put into place to prevent people from getting desperate like this in the first place.


16
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Richard Seguin, Saint John on 30/10/09 12:41:03 PM AST
Umm... where does it say he doesn't have a job? Do people with jobs ever run into financial difficulties?

Yet another quality post by D. Murray. Keep em coming you ignorant boob.
17
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seymour Incompetence, Saint John on 30/10/09 01:19:26 PM AST
Seymour Incompetence again your name speaks volumes about you. If this guy had a job he would not be stealing. Or maybe he has a job and is a drug addict or a gambler. In ANY event, he stole, in any event, he did not pay his bills. Where does it say people who are irresponsible should be supported by the rest of us who act responsible? Some people just need to grow up and suck it up and be good contributing citizens of the community. I know electricity is not cheap, but I also know I am not going to steal to pay for it.
17
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
D Murray, Rothesay on 30/10/09 01:32:20 PM AST
I'm not totally convinced that this persons actions are based on laziness. For one the article says he was living off a generator and a BBQ all summer long, the price of gas for his generator would have cost him money. Eating BBQ all summer isn't the cheapest either. I think the most compelling evidence that this person must have been desperate rather then lazy is that the judge fined him $1,000 and ordered to pay by Feb. If this person was indeed lazy and just wanted to steal for the sake of stealing, the judge wouldn't have been led to believe that the money could be paid back by that time.

The problem with the "send them to jail" attitude is that people forget it's their tax dollars paying for the persons 3 square meals a day. Not to mention them being on Social Development afterwards because they are unemployable due to a criminal record. You might want to re-think the "send them to jail" line of thinking.
11
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Richard Seguin, Saint John on 30/10/09 01:41:01 PM AST
Not once in my post did I mention what society should shouldn't do. My comment has EVERYTHING to do with your existense in the mystical land of Assumptionville.

You're very good at making gross assumptions about people and situations... I happen to find it annoying and irresponsible.


This man committed a crime, he was justly punished for it. End of story. Why add made up garbage to it? Seriously... find something else to do.

8
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seymour Incompetence, Saint John on 30/10/09 01:43:32 PM AST
*Considers changing name to 'Seymour Idiocy' - might be appropriate when responding to posts by D.Murray*
5
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seymour Incompetence, Saint John on 30/10/09 01:45:34 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles