The Delusional, Deflective World of mayor Ivan Court

Published Wednesday July 1st, 2009
C1

I have to admit I was a bit taken aback as I watched Mayor Ivan Court at a common council meeting launch a verbal accusatory rant at the Telegraph-Journal, publisher Jamie Irving and senior editor Ron Barry. I felt, well, to tell you the truth, left out. After all, over the past two and a half years who has been more critical concerning senior city management and council's performance than me? I'm not the Telegraph-Journal, just one of the thousands of taxpayers in Saint John taxpayers who are sick and tired of council's making excuses and not holding city management accountable.

The Telegraph-Journal hired Corporate Research Associates, an independent company, to poll Saint Johners on critically important issues and the people have spoken. The problem is that King "¦ I mean Mayor Court ... doesn't like the results so he attacks the messenger. The articles contain questions that deal with the same long-standing issues that candidates were introduced as they went door to door during the election campaign in May 2008 and yet again during the town hall meetings in the fall. Court doesn't like the results so now he is trying the same bully tactics on the newspaper that he uses on councillors who don't see things his way. Why do you suppose local real estate agent Gerry Webster has so many people eager to sign his petition to recall the mayor? You can download the form at www.recallsaintjohn.ca and, by the way, I plan to sign it.

How about the reason Court gives to the media for city manager Terry Totten's resignation? Why it's because of all the negative articles leveled at Totten by the Telegraph-Journal. Hmmm "¦ let's see ... if you have a baseball team that has lost 19 out its last 20 games, how do you propose we spin that into a good news story and why would you? Well, let's see? We could try. ... "At least they kept their uniforms clean."

Back to basics and the facts: Saint John has a city manager form of government. That means the city manger is responsible for running the city, much the same as a chief executive officer in a corporation. Council, on the other hand, functions like a board of directors to protect the interest of the taxpayers. The city manager brings recommendations to council for consideration and approval. Now, here is the really important part: Council "relies" on the city manager to bring forward "sound recommendations." Over the past 15 years, Totten brought more than 5,000 recommendations to council. This and previous councils accepted all but a few. How should we gauge the quality and soundness of those recommendations?

Let's take a quick vital signs snapshot for Saint John

* We have the second-highest tax rate of any city in Atlantic Canada.

* We have the highest fire protection cost per person of any city in Atlantic Canada, (more than twice the New Brunswick average).

* We have an abundance of dilapidated and fire-trap buildings that should have been leveled years ago.

* Our population base continued to decline up until the 2006 census. Saint John was one of only two cities in Canada to have a declining population (Moncton's increase in population out-stripped the national average).

* Highest level of poverty per capita of any city in Canada. Why? Because too many of Saint John's upper to middle income bracket have "escaped" to the valley.

* A sewer and water system that has been allowed to deteriorate to an unacceptable and dangerous level.

* Roads conditions that are appalling. Don't believe me? Take a drive on almost any street.

* A pension fund with a $140-million-plus unfunded deficit.

* A city employee long-term disability rate three to four times higher than"¦. Oh, there's that word again ... Moncton.

* A lawsuit by the pension board against former councillor John Ferguson, who dared question the management of the fund and disability numbers. (Remember, Totten is one of the plaintiffs in the suit.)

* The last 15 years with no formal sick leave policy in place.

* The last 15 years with no benchmarking or performance criteria for any department. (You can't manage what you don't measure.)

If the above were the statistics for a company, how would you say we are doing?

Is that enough?

So did Totten resign because of negative articles about him or did he resign because the people and council had lost confidence in his ability to effectively manage city affairs? It's your city, you be the judge.

Herb Duncan is a Saint John businessman who has followed city issues for more than three decades. He can be reached by email at duncan.herb@telegraphjournal.com

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (94)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Mark Foley said, "I know Ivan Court Very well, I was a student of his and he was my ball coach at St Mac's, please tell me what does Ivan Courts Failed venture have to do with him being mayor?"

If you don't understand by now what having good business sense has to do with leading the city then I guess Ivan Court must have been a worse teacher than he is a mayor...pathetic!
14
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
R. Boudreau, Saint John on 03/07/09 08:08:52 AM AST
Boudreau, Ivan worked at those other businesses as sidelines, the man was an educator and he also fought for St. Joes after the death of his son do you remember? perhaps not. I think this man put his name on the ticket to help Saint John and Not for personal gain, Please tell me Boudreau what is his Worship gaining from this? Why don't you sign you name to the ticket for mayor next time. By the way did you have Ivan as a teacher? If not you can not comment on what he was like can you.
4
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
M. Foley, quispamsis on 03/07/09 09:53:17 AM AST
I am done with this topic......bring on the next one, great country we live in at lease we can have this discussion.
7
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Marc Foley, quispamsis on 03/07/09 09:58:04 AM AST
dear enuff we are all still waiting for you to enlighten us to what it is you do for a living and what great strains you have taken to make this a better community. stop being so shy
2
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
scott riccio, quispamsis on 03/07/09 10:04:00 AM AST
mr Boudreau your lack of maturity in your comment suggests you were never tutored or educated by anyone , and being "involved" in the business world does not mean you had any success!
2
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
scott riccio, quispamsis on 03/07/09 10:18:38 AM AST
Everyone needs to be paying their fair and equal share of the tax burden and then and only then can the taxes come down. Irving gets their sweetheart tax deals through coercion and intimidation, along with threats of closing and moving elsewhere. The sweetheart deal he and Rapsol got on the much touted LNG Terminal would have likely generated enough tax revenue that the tax rate likely could have come down for all property owners in Saint John, but corporate greed is alive and well with the Irvings. The other greedy element in all this is the Government of NB who allows the cities to claim they are holding the line on taxes knowing full well that the province is going to stick it to everyone through increased assessments and that translates into higher taxes for most working people, seniors and those living in poverty, because every increase in property taxes & hydro rates translates into higher rents for the poor.
3
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
J. Wayne McQueen, Burnaby on 03/07/09 09:18:00 PM AST
There's one thing to add to Herb's points. It is the responsibility of the elected council to set direction for city management as well as to approve "a response". With no direction, the only blame you can start with is the council. If they expect management to set direction and responses (as it seems to be) then the results will speak for themselves (as Herb has indicated). Management has to plan, oranise, direct and control. Anything less is chaos, a ship without a rudder . Every time Court babbles in public, blames someone else and cannot understand management, we have chaos! A year is too long for Court; fours years would be an even deeper rut to crawl out from; let's hope the impeachment works and takes the rest as well!

Insanity: doing things the same way over and over and expecting different results... Einstein
4
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Very Concerned for Saint John, Saint John on 03/07/09 10:49:36 PM AST
Shouldnt a lot of the blame be put on the monkeys who ELECTED them?

Im not pro-Ivan but it seems like Ivan got a lot of "Hey he taught me in Gr 10" votes.

I think we should trap all the nincompoops who voted this council in. It'll be easy....we'll put lime green crocks in all our potholes. Nincompoops cannot resist lime green crocks or wolf tshirts.

Once they make a move for the rubbery ugly treasures, we'll mash them in the potholes. Everyone wins!

MC FRESH FOR MAYOR!!!!!!!!!!
6
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
MC FRESH, Grand Bay on 04/07/09 10:52:44 AM AST
Here is what I do not understand about the "Sweetheart" Tax deal people on here love to bring up. Prior to building the LNG terminal the tax on that peice of land was virtually zero. Two companies put a huge investment into the land and employ a lot of people. Do they get a deal on the tax, yes, but they are still on the hook for $500,000/year. Now my degree is not in mathematics, but half a million seems to be a lot more than zero.

The next question and one that has mistified me since moving here 10 years ago is why when a company that has been here for 50+ years gets a deal everyone is up in arms, but when a call center gets multi million dollar tax breaks for providing 200 or so $10/hour jobs no one minds.

Now for Ivan Court and Terry Totten, if the paper were printing lies I have little doubt they would sue, they seem to have no problem with leveling lawsuits. Just ask former councilor Ferguson
2
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Opinion O., Saint John on 06/07/09 07:49:40 PM AST
Opinion O., Saint John: Yes $500,000.00 is better then zero, but then again not as good as say $2 million. Its not just that the tax rate is low, it is also NOT adjusted for inflation. How big will $500,000.00 be in twenty years?

On top of that consider the municipal costs associated with the LNG plant: road maintenance, municipal planning, snow removal, fire services etc. At the end of the day this deal will cost taxpayers money. We would have been better off leaving the property as is.

5
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
JJ Ross, Saint John on 07/07/09 09:28:34 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles