
The Delusional, Deflective World of mayor Ivan Court
Published Wednesday July 1st, 2009


I have to admit I was a bit taken aback as I watched Mayor Ivan Court at a common council meeting launch a verbal accusatory rant at the Telegraph-Journal, publisher Jamie Irving and senior editor Ron Barry. I felt, well, to tell you the truth, left out. After all, over the past two and a half years who has been more critical concerning senior city management and council's performance than me? I'm not the Telegraph-Journal, just one of the thousands of taxpayers in Saint John taxpayers who are sick and tired of council's making excuses and not holding city management accountable.
The Telegraph-Journal hired Corporate Research Associates, an independent company, to poll Saint Johners on critically important issues and the people have spoken. The problem is that King "¦ I mean Mayor Court ... doesn't like the results so he attacks the messenger. The articles contain questions that deal with the same long-standing issues that candidates were introduced as they went door to door during the election campaign in May 2008 and yet again during the town hall meetings in the fall. Court doesn't like the results so now he is trying the same bully tactics on the newspaper that he uses on councillors who don't see things his way. Why do you suppose local real estate agent Gerry Webster has so many people eager to sign his petition to recall the mayor? You can download the form at www.recallsaintjohn.ca and, by the way, I plan to sign it.
How about the reason Court gives to the media for city manager Terry Totten's resignation? Why it's because of all the negative articles leveled at Totten by the Telegraph-Journal. Hmmm "¦ let's see ... if you have a baseball team that has lost 19 out its last 20 games, how do you propose we spin that into a good news story and why would you? Well, let's see? We could try. ... "At least they kept their uniforms clean."
Back to basics and the facts: Saint John has a city manager form of government. That means the city manger is responsible for running the city, much the same as a chief executive officer in a corporation. Council, on the other hand, functions like a board of directors to protect the interest of the taxpayers. The city manager brings recommendations to council for consideration and approval. Now, here is the really important part: Council "relies" on the city manager to bring forward "sound recommendations." Over the past 15 years, Totten brought more than 5,000 recommendations to council. This and previous councils accepted all but a few. How should we gauge the quality and soundness of those recommendations?
Let's take a quick vital signs snapshot for Saint John
* We have the second-highest tax rate of any city in Atlantic Canada.
* We have the highest fire protection cost per person of any city in Atlantic Canada, (more than twice the New Brunswick average).
* We have an abundance of dilapidated and fire-trap buildings that should have been leveled years ago.
* Our population base continued to decline up until the 2006 census. Saint John was one of only two cities in Canada to have a declining population (Moncton's increase in population out-stripped the national average).
* Highest level of poverty per capita of any city in Canada. Why? Because too many of Saint John's upper to middle income bracket have "escaped" to the valley.
* A sewer and water system that has been allowed to deteriorate to an unacceptable and dangerous level.
* Roads conditions that are appalling. Don't believe me? Take a drive on almost any street.
* A pension fund with a $140-million-plus unfunded deficit.
* A city employee long-term disability rate three to four times higher than"¦. Oh, there's that word again ... Moncton.
* A lawsuit by the pension board against former councillor John Ferguson, who dared question the management of the fund and disability numbers. (Remember, Totten is one of the plaintiffs in the suit.)
* The last 15 years with no formal sick leave policy in place.
* The last 15 years with no benchmarking or performance criteria for any department. (You can't manage what you don't measure.)
If the above were the statistics for a company, how would you say we are doing?
Is that enough?
So did Totten resign because of negative articles about him or did he resign because the people and council had lost confidence in his ability to effectively manage city affairs? It's your city, you be the judge.
Herb Duncan is a Saint John businessman who has followed city issues for more than three decades. He can be reached by email at duncan.herb@telegraphjournal.com


Disabled








Search Articles


Comments (94)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
I say this as a non-firefighter so Scott might not like it. He has a history of harassing those who don't choose his career for themselves on TJ comments boards.
I think it should be fairly obvious that it really wouldn't matter what was actually going on in this city. Dear old Herbie would find SOME subject to rant about and run into the ground. I certainly don't blame Mayor Court for choosing not to even recognize the foolishness that he writes.
PS Anyone else find it interesting that he is neither silent NOR in the majority???
On the contrary, I find Herb's opinions and comments ring true with the vast majority of SJ citizens and that number is growing fast. I find that I can't enter a coffee shop or attend a backyard BBQ without city hall's incompetence being discussed (or shall I say disgust).
We have had a stream of Mayors who are put into power, and have no idea how to make change. They become " YES" men for the most part. The Irvings provide alot of employment in the city and nobody wants to step directly on their toes. If they did then Irving would have to pay the same taxes as other businesses, and that would eat into their profits.
Back when Shirley McAlary was Mayor the issue came up of the Irvings paying water tax. This was a situation that existed for years. The answer at that time was that the City couldn't figure out how much to charge them so it was left as it was..they didn't charge them any.
To my knowledge this issue has never been resolved.
Good Management?
Maybe you should get off the couch and out of cyberspace once in a while and find what the majority are saying out there in the "real world".