The Delusional, Deflective World of mayor Ivan Court

Published Wednesday July 1st, 2009
C1

I have to admit I was a bit taken aback as I watched Mayor Ivan Court at a common council meeting launch a verbal accusatory rant at the Telegraph-Journal, publisher Jamie Irving and senior editor Ron Barry. I felt, well, to tell you the truth, left out. After all, over the past two and a half years who has been more critical concerning senior city management and council's performance than me? I'm not the Telegraph-Journal, just one of the thousands of taxpayers in Saint John taxpayers who are sick and tired of council's making excuses and not holding city management accountable.

The Telegraph-Journal hired Corporate Research Associates, an independent company, to poll Saint Johners on critically important issues and the people have spoken. The problem is that King "¦ I mean Mayor Court ... doesn't like the results so he attacks the messenger. The articles contain questions that deal with the same long-standing issues that candidates were introduced as they went door to door during the election campaign in May 2008 and yet again during the town hall meetings in the fall. Court doesn't like the results so now he is trying the same bully tactics on the newspaper that he uses on councillors who don't see things his way. Why do you suppose local real estate agent Gerry Webster has so many people eager to sign his petition to recall the mayor? You can download the form at www.recallsaintjohn.ca and, by the way, I plan to sign it.

How about the reason Court gives to the media for city manager Terry Totten's resignation? Why it's because of all the negative articles leveled at Totten by the Telegraph-Journal. Hmmm "¦ let's see ... if you have a baseball team that has lost 19 out its last 20 games, how do you propose we spin that into a good news story and why would you? Well, let's see? We could try. ... "At least they kept their uniforms clean."

Back to basics and the facts: Saint John has a city manager form of government. That means the city manger is responsible for running the city, much the same as a chief executive officer in a corporation. Council, on the other hand, functions like a board of directors to protect the interest of the taxpayers. The city manager brings recommendations to council for consideration and approval. Now, here is the really important part: Council "relies" on the city manager to bring forward "sound recommendations." Over the past 15 years, Totten brought more than 5,000 recommendations to council. This and previous councils accepted all but a few. How should we gauge the quality and soundness of those recommendations?

Let's take a quick vital signs snapshot for Saint John

* We have the second-highest tax rate of any city in Atlantic Canada.

* We have the highest fire protection cost per person of any city in Atlantic Canada, (more than twice the New Brunswick average).

* We have an abundance of dilapidated and fire-trap buildings that should have been leveled years ago.

* Our population base continued to decline up until the 2006 census. Saint John was one of only two cities in Canada to have a declining population (Moncton's increase in population out-stripped the national average).

* Highest level of poverty per capita of any city in Canada. Why? Because too many of Saint John's upper to middle income bracket have "escaped" to the valley.

* A sewer and water system that has been allowed to deteriorate to an unacceptable and dangerous level.

* Roads conditions that are appalling. Don't believe me? Take a drive on almost any street.

* A pension fund with a $140-million-plus unfunded deficit.

* A city employee long-term disability rate three to four times higher than"¦. Oh, there's that word again ... Moncton.

* A lawsuit by the pension board against former councillor John Ferguson, who dared question the management of the fund and disability numbers. (Remember, Totten is one of the plaintiffs in the suit.)

* The last 15 years with no formal sick leave policy in place.

* The last 15 years with no benchmarking or performance criteria for any department. (You can't manage what you don't measure.)

If the above were the statistics for a company, how would you say we are doing?

Is that enough?

So did Totten resign because of negative articles about him or did he resign because the people and council had lost confidence in his ability to effectively manage city affairs? It's your city, you be the judge.

Herb Duncan is a Saint John businessman who has followed city issues for more than three decades. He can be reached by email at duncan.herb@telegraphjournal.com

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (94)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Scotty Riccio---SJ should look at moving somewhat towards volunteers to save money, other areas make out just fine.

the taxes i pay allow me to criticize how this city, prov or country is run, and that doesn't mean i have to run for office.
34
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Nuff Said, Saint John on 01/07/09 01:05:14 PM AST
Nuff Said. Which employer do you work for that would let you leave if your pager goes off to attend a fire scene. Moncton is able to accomodate 40 vollies yet they are barely able to keep 20. volunteers in Moncton are not used as a first responders but as rehab personnel to give the firefighters who have been on scene for a long duration a break.

Any firefigher, volunteer or professional, is required to complete firefighter 1 and 2 along with medical first responder and hazmat certification. People go to school for 9 months straight to get these courses, that a lot of weekends an Tuesday nights away from home for a city resident with a family and a full time job.
16
Thumbs Up
27
Thumbs Down
nicks dad, Saint John on 01/07/09 01:25:48 PM AST
Scott - Cities that have lower tax rates - is one to conclude people in dire need of medical assistance in those cities get inferior response times compared to Saint John? No doubt you save people's lives - the question is which agency should be responding within an acceptable time frame. Maybe this is an issue of inferior ambulance service in Saint John and the fire department picking up the slack. If thats the case, the province needs to be responsible for that, not the taxpayers. As for personalized stories about saving people's lives, etc... - I find people use that to shut down debate. If other cities can have excellent response times by provincially funded services, so should we.
43
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Andrew W., Saint John on 01/07/09 01:29:01 PM AST
typical union thinking about Change---
1. can't work(don't want it to work)
2. won't work(will not let it work)
3. this is bad for the union so everyone else be dam
35
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Nuff Said, Saint John on 01/07/09 03:12:53 PM AST
Scott and Nicks Dad--i've seen cases where the fire truck was the last to show, i've also seen a case where a fire truck, police and ambulance all showed up for a person who twisted their ankle.

what a waste.
32
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Nuff Said, Saint John on 01/07/09 03:24:44 PM AST
This is an important discussion, regardless of our opinions; it means we care about our community. That being said was anyone else hoping to see an article pertaining to local Canada Day Festivities?
Most other major newspapers are running them (even Irving owned papers)
Fredericton Daily Gleaner: http://dailygleaner.canadaeast.com/
Moncton Times-Transcript: http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/front/article/715505
Halifax Chronicle Herald: http://thechronicleherald.ca/NovaScotia/1130037.html
The Toronto Star: http://www.thestar.com/
I could go on…of course this is just my humble opinion.
18
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
. Lorax, Saint John on 01/07/09 03:33:04 PM AST
If the firefighters are so confident that their service delivery is efficient, absolutely necessary and worth every dollar - why the resistence to having a full operational review by an unbiased third party? Are you afraid what the findings will show? Spare me the "it's a waste of money" - the city has a culture of wasting money.
35
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Andrew W., Saint John on 01/07/09 03:39:53 PM AST
Nuff Said, I don't think anyone said for the Industries to leave town. I think what people have said is that proper Fire Protection is required should anything ever happen, and we all know that things have happened in the past (Refinery Explosion).

As far as the FD being used as Medical First Responders, being a retired Paramedic, I can tell you that having the Fire Department as a First Responder sometimes can be priceless. When they arrive first, they can administer first aid, oxygen therapy,CPR, C-spine immobilization, and if nothing else, piece of mind to the patient.

If the Ambulance gets there first, the FD is usually cancelled.

If this saves only one live a year, how do you put a price tag on that? And why would you?
9
Thumbs Up
23
Thumbs Down
I Give A Damn, Saint John on 01/07/09 03:40:47 PM AST
Andrew the review is being done by an unbiased third party. Last council meeting council voted to approve the funds to have a review done by a company which conducts the reviews that insurance companies use to base there ratings on.

The only person who felt it was a waste of money was councillor Titus. The last independant review was done in 93 or 94 and council didn't like the results of that one either.

Nuff Said. You mentioned volunteers, I gave you some facts about how volunteers are used and what qualifications they need.

As for the incident your refering to. The dispatching policies of the city are always to be more cautious rather than less. They would rather send the resources there and find out it's nothing instead of the opposite. It may have been a 911 hang up call, or there may have been a language barrier etc,etc. There are many possibilities. Unless you know the exact details of this incident you should reserve your judgement until you know everything about it.
8
Thumbs Up
25
Thumbs Down
nicks dad, Saint John on 01/07/09 04:29:13 PM AST
Andrew not once did I or any of my co workers object to the review..we welcome it with open arms as we know just like the last 2 independant reviews they will come back recomending that we add not subtract. we feel its a waste of money because it will be ignored like the last time. and to ENUFF i never said you dont have the right to critize however do so by using facts not falasy.you still didnt bother to answer what your profession is,it was a simple question actually.
8
Thumbs Up
27
Thumbs Down
scott riccio, quispamsis on 01/07/09 04:39:39 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles