Sick-leave policy more generous than others

Published Monday March 23rd, 2009
C1

SAINT JOHN - A proposed sick-leave policy for city management staff initially appears to be more generous than benefits packages offered by public and private employers in the city and across the region.

Managers and non-unionized employees in New Brunswick's public service can collect full salary for four months before they can receive benefits under an insured, long-term disability plan, said Vicki Squires, a vice-president with Regional Health Authority B.

The employees must first accumulate enough sick days to take the time off. Every year, staff receives 15 sick days, which means they would have to bank sick time for eight years before they could receive full salary when ill and off the job for four months.

Should they not have enough sick days banked, they could apply for a federal employment insurance program to support their sick leave until they can receive long-term disability benefits.

City manager Terry Totten proposes a sick-leave plan for management staff that would allow employees to collect full pay for six months before they can collect disability benefits, eight weeks longer than the province's public service allows.

But the public service also lets employees accumulate sick time up to a maximum of 240 days. This means an employee with an illness could have the option of collecting full salary for eight months, rather than applying for long-term disability benefits after four months of their illness.

Still, Squires said the six-week-long sick-leave plan proposed by the city, which is on council's agenda tonight, may be reasonable.

"If an individual has cancer and they have been a loyal employee for 25 or 30 years and that was part of the benefits package and the terms and conditions of employment, that might be entirely appropriate," Squires said.

Much like the public service, many private employers generally allow employees to collect pay for four months before they can apply for long-term benefits under an insurance provider, said Todd Stephen, senior consultant with OMG Benefits Consulting.

Some smaller employers, however, don't offer these types of sick-leave plans, Stephen said. They generally allow employees to take about 10 sick days every year, with a federal employment insurance benefit covering the remainder of sick time, he said.

But Stephen, who has worked in the benefits consulting industry for 22 years, said larger employers provide some level of compensation, typically between two-thirds and 100 per cent of their salary.

"The duration for short-term sick-leave benefits is generally about four months," said Stephen, whose company serves 500 large and small companies primarily in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. "The reason for that is that when you get to the four-month mark, that is the point in time when your long-term disability plan would kick in."

The proposed sick-leave plan for city managers isn't an anomaly in Saint John, however. Moosehead Breweries has a very similar package, offering management employees full salary for six months before they apply for long-term disability benefits.

Deputy Mayor Stephen Chase said the city's proposed policy simply makes sense.

Right now, city management staff can be away from work for up to two years, all on the taxpayers' dime.

"The key is to move toward that insured benefit program that is fully paid by employees," Chase said. "This is just solid policy that everyone, taxpayers and employees, can benefit from."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (7)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I know the city has lots of money so why not go with a personal nurse on call 7/24 and maid service while their sick. Lets get real and consider our finacial situation before we make a commitment that we will regret. They should earn days first, plain and simple.
42
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
John Campbell, Saint John on 23/03/09 06:42:39 AM AST
Why would the City of Saint John even entertain implementing a sick leave policy that is more generous than that in place for other civil servants?
Why not utilize the 15 weeks of earned EI sick leave the City and their employees already have paid for before hitting the taxpayers with another bill?
Any sick leave paid for with taxpayer dollars should be earned and the employees should pay for additional sick leave through an insurance company plan. People with more serious illnesses like cancer can then be accommodated differently.
The city can no longer be the leader in providing expensive benefits to its employees. The Deputy Mayor's background as a civil servant shows when he says he thinks this rich scheme is a good idea.
This city has a large number of taxpayers who are on fixed income, who have no pensions, no sick leave and who can no longer afford to pay the bill for our city's fat cat benefit schemes.
Wake up councillors!
41
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Anonymous Reader, Saint John on 23/03/09 08:10:54 AM AST
why are the city employees/council so concerned with sick time? are they in a treachous industry? shouldn't they lead by example?

healthcare workers have to earn sick time. is the council saying that working for the city is so hard and backbreaking and stressful that they need the time off?
30
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
sick in the city , saint john on 23/03/09 09:19:37 AM AST
Why is SJ's management association pushing the new sick leave proposal & behaving like it's a union? And when did Common Council vote in Open session to waive the declared present day conflicts of interest of Solicitor John Nugent and City Mgr. Terrence Totten so they can offer advice to Council on a proposal that the 2 men obviously stand to gain from if it becomes city policy? All conflicts of interest in government have to be waived so that the person with the conflict can participate in policy recommendations on an issue. Why is this not the case with the 2 men in THIS Council, as opposed to a vote or request of a previous council used as a pretext, as Nugent is doing, in referring to a past council letting him offer his advice even though he has a conflict. SJ's Management and professional non union staff may be violating federal labour law by organizing itself as a defacto union. The Attorney General of the Province ought to look at SJ's Mgmt. Assoc.
20
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Who do you Believe, Saint John on 23/03/09 12:34:31 PM AST
Every time Solicitor John Nugent, the Common Clerk Elizabeth Gormley, the City Mgr. and City Mgmnt or a Common Councillor declares a conflict of interest on a matter before Council he or she withdraw from the room until or unless Council votes in Open Session, and gives reason to the public for doing so, to waive the conflict for him or her. There is no reason for Council to act like docile sheep whenever Nugent declares his conflict of interest, and let him sit there and offer his advice to them on a matter. Someone on Council should have the gumption to ask Nugent to step out of the room so Council can discuss whether his conflict ought to be waived with a Council vote in open session.
22
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Who do you Believe, Saint John on 23/03/09 12:43:26 PM AST
As soon as I read the line "City manager Terry Totten proposes...." I started laughing. I have been reading so many articles online in the TJ about Mr Totten and his "proposals", that I no longer ask how he gets away with the foolishness he does, my sympathies to the taxpayers of St. John for having to put up with this character.
21
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Another Tax Payer, Fredericton on 23/03/09 01:35:46 PM AST
"initially"???
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
d g, saint john on 23/03/09 09:58:05 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles