Appeals skyrocket

Published Tuesday June 30th, 2009

Real estate Objections to province's property value assessments have jumped by 57 per cent

A1

The number of New Brunswickers filing appeals of their property tax assessments jumped by more than 3,000 this year and some homeowners say the reason is an inconsistent assessment system that needs to be more transparent.

There were 8,542 appeals filed as of June 26 for residences and businesses in the province, compared to 5,457 in 2008. Of those, 7,349 were residential filings, while 1,193 were non-residential.

"The high this year was not unexpected, given that New Brunswick real estate really kept its value at a time when the rest of North America was seeing falling real estate values - and it's the worst recession in 75 years," Brent Roy, spokesman for Service New Brunswick, said in an interview on Monday.

Appeals are broken down by 11 regions throughout the province.

Of those, the Saint John, Fredericton and Moncton areas saw the highest numbers of appeals. Despite the spike, however, Service New Brunswick didn't hire additional personnel to deal with the influx of paperwork, opting instead to shuffle staff to different offices, Roy said.

Jason Stephen, vice-president of the board of directors for the Saint John Real Estate Board, said the increase in appeals is due to a continuing lack of transparency in the assessment process.

"My experience is that peoples' homes are sometimes assessed (at) more than what they should be," he said. "On the flip side, sometimes they're not assessed at what the market value is. It's inconsistent and I think that's the issue at hand right now for governments. There needs to be more consistency."

Stephen said homes in the same area often are assessed at the same price when, in reality, one home may be owned by a senior who has never renovated, while a new bathroom may have just been installed in the other home.

Roy, however, attributes at least part of the spike to New Brunswickers' expecting lower assessments due to the global economy, which has taken a toll on housing prices in some markets, especially in the United States.

He points out that hasn't been the case in New Brunswick, where real estate prices are the highest they've ever been. According to the New Brunswick Real Estate Association, the average home price rose nine per cent to $166,672 from May 2008 to May 2009.

"Two years ago we were at a generational low in terms of (assessment) appeals. Obviously, when things are going well like they are now and your tax bill is higher, people tend to scrutinize it more," Roy said.

Stephen, who's also the government relations chairman for the real estate association, said the group is lobbying for an assessment cap to allow people to properly budget money for property taxes.

"That would allow people from the onset to know that their properties aren't going to go up more than three or five per cent every year, so they can budget that. The problem is now that you have a situation where you can go up 18 or 20 per cent," he said.

Stephen filed an appeal this year over his property tax assessment and he plans to continue pushing for a better system.

"When your tax bill goes up by 20 per cent, you're talking $500 or $600 a year, and that's a lot of money. So when you're trying to budget your house, it's pretty darn hard if there's no consistency on the tax rate and it just goes up arbitrarily every year."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (8)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

The whole concept of property tax seems unfair to me. It amounts to a tax on capital assets and the amount owing has very little to do with an individual's ability to pay. Shelter is a basic necessity of life and should not be taxed. It would be far more fair and equitable to have higher consumption taxes.
32
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Port City, Saint John on 30/06/09 08:24:13 AM AST
Will the people never learn? They had a chance to have both fairness and political accountability put into the assessment system at the last election but they chose to listen to this paper and put in this Liberal government instead.
Those with vested interests will try to confuse the picture but market valve is market value and in general,that depends on location and not on a new bathroom. It has no relation to user income or user services. It’s the darling of both the bureaucracy and the politician.
In simple terms, its a market system driven by the same speculation that destroyed so many pensions, incomes and maybe the world economy It determines whether you can afford to stay in your own home and it can only exist with the assistance of our politicians and media. It’s a system that allows politicians to spend freely w/o accountability.
This will continue until the voters learn to vote smart and not family tradition or simple name recognition.

“The media is the problem”
19
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
LEONARD MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 30/06/09 08:59:06 AM AST
"Port city" is right on...a consumption tax would be the answer to many problems. It certainly would be fairer and it could also supply need funding to the cities, even rewarding those whose performance encouraged growth.
19
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
LEONARD MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 30/06/09 09:07:53 AM AST
If you look at the national average property taxes, in new brunswick cities is comparably lower than the national average. However, how the government does its business of expecting more money needs to be always under a microscope.
In Calgary, property taxes have jumped over 150% in the last 10 years.
11
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
just beinghonest, calgary on 30/06/09 09:34:45 AM AST
So, 'honest', are you saying home owners in Calgary are happy and we should go for the 150% too? Not to worry, we'll soon be there before long but w/o the oil or hogh wages.
12
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
LEONARD MCLAUGHLIN, Quispamsis on 30/06/09 09:55:37 AM AST
The only way to fix our property tax system is to abolish it. We already pay Federal and Provincial taxes based on income so why not pay local taxes the same way? Income taxes are used by these two levels of government to build roads, hospitals and schools so why can’t cities and villages in New Brunswick do the same to operate arenas, collect garbage and provide police protection? We would only have to add a third section to the forms we presently use to file our income taxes every year so that local governments such as Saint John, Dieppe or Blackville could collect the funds needed to provide services based on the incomes of their residents rather than their property values? Millions of dollars would be saved in salaries because we wouldn’t need an entire workforce to evaluate properties and process the thousands of appeals on property tax assessments that are filed every year. The property tax system should be scrapped because it is inefficient, costly and unfair.
7
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
M. Cormier, Dieppe on 30/06/09 02:30:28 PM AST
No I am not happy at all, I would like to pay no property tax. However, the provincial gov't in New Brunswick is looking at national averages to justify the cause of increasing property taxes. It is part of NB going toward self-sufficiency.
0
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
just beinghonest, calgary on 30/06/09 03:56:21 PM AST
Every tax is subject to the law of diminishing return. If consumption taxes were increased to compensate for property tax, the government might get less revenue, not more. Nobody likes taxes but we need the services and they have o be paid for

The problem is with the assessments. Properties are subject to an infllation factor every year or most years, but therre is also a deflation factor due to the age of the home. This is what is not taken correctly into account. The deflation factor is due to the age of the home. An older home is obviously worth less than a newer home. After ten years, a home has a depreciation factor as well as an apppreciation factor. New homes are assessed at close to their value however older homes are assessed at more than they are worth. I strongly suggest if you have an older home to appeal the assessmentt.Some people believe if their home is assessed high they will get more if they sell. This is not true. Appeal your assessment.
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
J. R, Moncton, NB on 01/07/09 11:29:43 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles